The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2026
Dynamic imaging and wrist biomechanics: a narrative review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xiang Ziyue, Jia Shijie, Chen Shanlin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The wrist is a complex joint with tightly coupled intercarpal kinematics that remain difficult to interpret clinically. Traditional models, derived from static imaging and cadaveric studies, treat the wrist as a three-dimensional structure. However, wrist biomechanics is inherently dynamic, emerging from interactions across motion phases, loading conditions and functional tasks. Current limitations contribute to under-recognition of clinically relevant instability.
METHODS: This narrative review summarizes representative studies from the past 10-15 years, with emphasis on in vivo dynamic imaging studies reporting quantitative kinematic outcomes. Four modalities (4D-CT, biplanar videoradiography, four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and motion capture) were evaluated in terms of kinematic findings and clinical utility, with findings organized by substructure.
RESULTS: Dynamic imaging demonstrates that wrist kinematics are phase-, load- and task-dependent. Abnormalities such as scapholunate instability may only become apparent during specific phases of motion or under physiological loading. 4D-CT currently provides the most accessible in vivo assessment of intercarpal coordination, while biplanar videoradiography offers high-precision kinematic analysis in controlled settings. Motion capture characterizes task-dependent wrist motion for functional activities but lacks intercarpal resolution, whereas four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging offers potential for integrating soft-tissue behaviour, although current applications remain limited.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic imaging shows that wrist instability arises from abnormal motion patterns rather than a static structural abnormality. Rather than competing, these modalities provide complementary, structure-specific insights. This framework supports clinical interpretation of wrist instability and guides appropriate technique selection. However, clinical interpretation will require further standardized protocols and clinically validated thresholds.
METHODS: This narrative review summarizes representative studies from the past 10-15 years, with emphasis on in vivo dynamic imaging studies reporting quantitative kinematic outcomes. Four modalities (4D-CT, biplanar videoradiography, four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and motion capture) were evaluated in terms of kinematic findings and clinical utility, with findings organized by substructure.
RESULTS: Dynamic imaging demonstrates that wrist kinematics are phase-, load- and task-dependent. Abnormalities such as scapholunate instability may only become apparent during specific phases of motion or under physiological loading. 4D-CT currently provides the most accessible in vivo assessment of intercarpal coordination, while biplanar videoradiography offers high-precision kinematic analysis in controlled settings. Motion capture characterizes task-dependent wrist motion for functional activities but lacks intercarpal resolution, whereas four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging offers potential for integrating soft-tissue behaviour, although current applications remain limited.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic imaging shows that wrist instability arises from abnormal motion patterns rather than a static structural abnormality. Rather than competing, these modalities provide complementary, structure-specific insights. This framework supports clinical interpretation of wrist instability and guides appropriate technique selection. However, clinical interpretation will require further standardized protocols and clinically validated thresholds.