Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2014
Development and evaluation of an automatic tumor segmentation tool: a comparison between automatic, semi-automatic and manual segmentation of mandibular odontogenic cysts and tumors.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rana Majeed, Modrow Daniel, Keuchel Jens, Chui Christopher, Rana Madiha, Wagner Maximilian, Gellrich Nils-Claudius
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of cancer in the head and neck region, computer-assisted surgery can be used to estimate location and extent by segmentation of the tumor. This article presents a new tool (Smartbrush), which allows for faster automated segmentation of the tumor.
METHODS: This new method was compared with other well-known techniques of segmentation. Thirty-eight patients with keratocystic odontogenic tumors were included in this study. The tumors were segmented using manual segmentation, threshold-based segmentation and segmentation using Smartbrush. All three methods were compared concerning usability, time expenditure and accuracy.
RESULTS: The results suggest that segmentation using Smartbrush is significantly faster with comparable accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: After a period of adjustment to the program, one can comfortably get reliable results that, compared with other methods, are not as dependent on the user's experience. Smartbrush segmentation is a reliable and fast method of segmentation in tumor surgery.
METHODS: This new method was compared with other well-known techniques of segmentation. Thirty-eight patients with keratocystic odontogenic tumors were included in this study. The tumors were segmented using manual segmentation, threshold-based segmentation and segmentation using Smartbrush. All three methods were compared concerning usability, time expenditure and accuracy.
RESULTS: The results suggest that segmentation using Smartbrush is significantly faster with comparable accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: After a period of adjustment to the program, one can comfortably get reliable results that, compared with other methods, are not as dependent on the user's experience. Smartbrush segmentation is a reliable and fast method of segmentation in tumor surgery.