Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2013
Impact of spinal imbalance and BMI on lumbar spinal canal stenosis determined by a diagnostic support tool: cohort study in community‑living people.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hirano Kenichi, Imagama Shiro, Hasegawa Yukiharu, Muramoto Akio, Ishiguro Naoki
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR) developed a diagnostic support tool (score range −2 to 16) for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS). It is well known that patients with LSS have a forward-bending posture while walking. We could find only one study which examined sagittal alignment of LSS patients. The objectives of this study were to screen community-living people with LSS, and to investigate the association between LSS and spinal sagittal alignment, range of motion (ROM), and other spinal or physical factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 286 subjects ≥50 years old in the study. We regarded those with a JSSR diagnostic risk score ≥7 as having LSS. We measured and evaluated lateral lumbar radiographs, sagittal parameters, sagittal balance, and spinal mobility as determined with SpinalMouse®, back muscle strength (BMS), and body mass index (BMI). Spinal inclination angle (SIA) was used as an index of sagittal balance.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that increased BMI (OR 1.121, p < 0.05) and SIA (OR 1.144, p < 0.05) were important relevant factors for LSS. BMI had significant positive correlations with SIA (r = 0.214), and thoracic and lumbar kyphosis angles (r = 0.283, 0.131), and negative correlations with sacral slope angle (r = −0.166), and lumbar and total spinal ROMs (r = −0.270, −0.166). SIA had significant positive correlations with age (r = 0.334), BMI (r = 0.214) and lumbar kyphosis angle (r = 0.525), and negative correlations with BMS (r = −0.268), and lumbar and total spinal ROMs (r = −0.184, −0.171).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased SIA and BMI might be the most relevant risk factors for LSS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 286 subjects ≥50 years old in the study. We regarded those with a JSSR diagnostic risk score ≥7 as having LSS. We measured and evaluated lateral lumbar radiographs, sagittal parameters, sagittal balance, and spinal mobility as determined with SpinalMouse®, back muscle strength (BMS), and body mass index (BMI). Spinal inclination angle (SIA) was used as an index of sagittal balance.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that increased BMI (OR 1.121, p < 0.05) and SIA (OR 1.144, p < 0.05) were important relevant factors for LSS. BMI had significant positive correlations with SIA (r = 0.214), and thoracic and lumbar kyphosis angles (r = 0.283, 0.131), and negative correlations with sacral slope angle (r = −0.166), and lumbar and total spinal ROMs (r = −0.270, −0.166). SIA had significant positive correlations with age (r = 0.334), BMI (r = 0.214) and lumbar kyphosis angle (r = 0.525), and negative correlations with BMS (r = −0.268), and lumbar and total spinal ROMs (r = −0.184, −0.171).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased SIA and BMI might be the most relevant risk factors for LSS.