MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/1413-785220162406161696

Медицинская библиотека · Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2016

ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR SUCCESS OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS SURGERY.

Brêtas Caroline Oliveira, Valentim Larissa Furbino de Pinho, Elias Nelson, Cardoso Igor Machado, de Almeida Joelmar César, Jacob Charbel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To identify the patient profile that obtains better clinical and quality of life improvement after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery, comparing the results in the pre and postoperative periods.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with lumbar spine stenosis submitted to surgery were prospectively evaluated. Through the 36-Item Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire we performed a preoperative analysis to identify morbidities and social security benefit earning. The SF-36 is a subjective postoperative questionnaire to assess surgical success six months after the surgery.

RESULTS

There were unfavorable outcomes in patients who received social security benefits and in those who had morbidities. According to the SF-36 score, the surgical result is better when the patient is non-smoker (p=0.05), non-hypertense (p=0.040), non-diabetic (p =0.010) or non sedentary (p=0.019), respectively on mental health, pain, social aspects and general health domains.

CONCLUSION

The patient profiles that best benefit from the surgery are those who do not have morbidities and had no social security benefit. Evidence Level II, Prospective Study.

Для цитирования: Brêtas Caroline Oliveira, Valentim Larissa Furbino de Pinho, Elias Nelson, Cardoso Igor Machado, de Almeida Joelmar César, Jacob Charbel. ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR SUCCESS OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS SURGERY.. Acta ortopedica brasileira. 2016. DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220162406161696.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.