International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025
Unveiling Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Systemic Sclerosis and Lupus Erythematosus Through Transcriptomic Profiling.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Ang-Jun, Ciou Jian-Ruei, Wu Po-Chang, Chen Yu-Pei, Chu Hsueh-Ting, Chang Hen-Hong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the molecular differences and commonalities between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by analyzing RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data. By focusing on differentially expressed genes and enriched pathways, the investigation seeks to identify unique biomarkers, shared pathways, and potential therapeutic targets for these autoimmune diseases.
METHODS: This study involved 10 patients with SSc and 24 with SLE who did not receive immunosuppressants. RNA-seq data from patients with SSc and SLE were analyzed using DESeq2 to identify differentially expressed genes. Functional and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted and comparative analyses were performed.
RESULTS: We identified 2055 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between patients with SSc and controls. Notably, the expression of the shared gene RGS5 was significantly downregulated in both SLE and SSc, with a more pronounced downregulation in SSc. Additionally, the expression of the key transcription factor EGR1 was upregulated in SSc, whereas that of BLK, ITGAM, and IFNG was upregulated in SLE. Network analysis identified hub genes-AP3D1, FTX, USP47, CUX1, ZC3H4, CAND1, INTS1, TRNT1, MTERF1, and SETD1B-that may play critical roles in the progression of both SLE and SSc.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that RGS5 could serve as a shared biomarker for vascular dysfunction, while EGR1 and BLK may represent therapeutic targets in SSc and SLE. Overall, this analysis enhances understanding of distinct and overlapping gene expression signatures in SSc and SLE, providing a foundation for future targeted treatment strategies and requiring further validation in larger cohorts.
METHODS: This study involved 10 patients with SSc and 24 with SLE who did not receive immunosuppressants. RNA-seq data from patients with SSc and SLE were analyzed using DESeq2 to identify differentially expressed genes. Functional and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted and comparative analyses were performed.
RESULTS: We identified 2055 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between patients with SSc and controls. Notably, the expression of the shared gene RGS5 was significantly downregulated in both SLE and SSc, with a more pronounced downregulation in SSc. Additionally, the expression of the key transcription factor EGR1 was upregulated in SSc, whereas that of BLK, ITGAM, and IFNG was upregulated in SLE. Network analysis identified hub genes-AP3D1, FTX, USP47, CUX1, ZC3H4, CAND1, INTS1, TRNT1, MTERF1, and SETD1B-that may play critical roles in the progression of both SLE and SSc.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that RGS5 could serve as a shared biomarker for vascular dysfunction, while EGR1 and BLK may represent therapeutic targets in SSc and SLE. Overall, this analysis enhances understanding of distinct and overlapping gene expression signatures in SSc and SLE, providing a foundation for future targeted treatment strategies and requiring further validation in larger cohorts.