Surgical Management of Metacarpal Fractures by a General Surgeon in Rural Australia: A Single-Centre Experience.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Metacarpal fractures are common injuries which can result in significant loss of function. While many metacarpal fractures can be treated nonoperatively, surgical management options include the use of Kirschner wires, plates and screws (1, 2). In Australia, metacarpal fractures are usually managed by specialised Plastic or Orthopaedic surgeons. Provision of plastic and orthopaedic surgery in rural and remote Australia is often limited. Management of metacarpal fractures by general surgeons, who are more widespread throughout rural Australia, is not described in the literature. This study describes the demographics, surgical techniques and outcomes of metacarpal fractures managed by a rural general surgeon in rural Western Australia.
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study.
DESIGN
Observational.
SETTING
Single-centre public hospital in rural Western Australia.
PARTICIPANTS
All patients who underwent surgical management of metacarpal fractures from 2018 to 2023 at the study hospital.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, mechanism of injury, surgical techniques and outcomes of surgically managed metacarpal fractures.
RESULTS
In total, 68 cases of surgically managed metacarpal fractures are described, including 42 open and 25 percutaneous fixations. Mean time to surgery from injury was 7.3 days (median 4 days). Documented nonunion or malunion occurred in 3% of cases. In total, seven cases required unplanned return to theatre, and four cases experienced postoperative infection within 30 days.
CONCLUSIONS
Metacarpal fractures can be safely managed by an appropriately trained general surgeon in rural Australia, ensuring patient-centred, timely and effective treatment with excellent clinical outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.