BMC genomics · 2026
scGPA: an LLM-assisted workflow for directional virtual gene perturbation analysis from single-cell transcriptomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Haijun, Li Hening, Zhao Qinghao, Zhou Xiang, Peng Lei, Cai Yangjie, Lin Rongzhen, Li Yufeng, Yuan Yiyi, Feng Wenyu, Liu Yun, Liu Zezheng, Li Qingchu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Existing virtual perturbation methods can often infer directional changes by comparing predicted post-perturbation expression profiles with control cells. However, workflows that directly return direction-specific downstream candidate genes together with confidence scores, evidence support and interpretable summaries remain limited. We developed scGPA, an LLM-assisted workflow system for directional single-cell virtual gene perturbation analysis.
METHODS: scGPA starts from raw single-cell RNA sequencing data and performs quality control, normalization, dimensionality reduction, clustering and cell-group selection. It then constructs cell-group-specific wild-type regulatory networks using repeated subsampling, principal component regression (PCR)/Ridge-based network inference and CP tensor denoising. Based on these networks, scGPA simulates dose-aware virtual knockdown of the target gene and applies signed perturbation propagation to estimate the magnitude and direction of downstream transcriptional responses. LLM assistance is used for marker-based cell-type annotation, evidence-guided candidate prioritization and user-facing biological summarization.
RESULTS: We benchmarked scGPA across five public Perturb-seq datasets and compared its performance with GEARS, scGPT and a random baseline. The overall correct prediction rate of scGPA was 23.0%, exceeding those of GEARS (20.7%), scGPT (15.1%) and the random baseline (13.6%). These results indicate that scGPA achieved a higher correct prediction rate than the two comparator models and the random baseline. We subsequently evaluated scGPA using a public osteosarcoma single-cell dataset and performed qRT-PCR validation in 143B osteosarcoma cells. Among genes with significant experimental changes, scGPA achieved a directional concordance of 76.9%. When all tested downstream genes were counted, 37.0% were directionally correct, 51.9% showed no significant change and 11.1% changed in the opposite direction.
CONCLUSIONS: scGPA provides a practical workflow system for predicting and prioritizing direction-specific downstream transcriptional responses after target-gene perturbation. By integrating single-cell regulatory network inference, signed virtual perturbation and LLM-assisted interpretation, scGPA supports target-gene function inference and downstream mechanistic investigation from single-cell transcriptomic data.
METHODS: scGPA starts from raw single-cell RNA sequencing data and performs quality control, normalization, dimensionality reduction, clustering and cell-group selection. It then constructs cell-group-specific wild-type regulatory networks using repeated subsampling, principal component regression (PCR)/Ridge-based network inference and CP tensor denoising. Based on these networks, scGPA simulates dose-aware virtual knockdown of the target gene and applies signed perturbation propagation to estimate the magnitude and direction of downstream transcriptional responses. LLM assistance is used for marker-based cell-type annotation, evidence-guided candidate prioritization and user-facing biological summarization.
RESULTS: We benchmarked scGPA across five public Perturb-seq datasets and compared its performance with GEARS, scGPT and a random baseline. The overall correct prediction rate of scGPA was 23.0%, exceeding those of GEARS (20.7%), scGPT (15.1%) and the random baseline (13.6%). These results indicate that scGPA achieved a higher correct prediction rate than the two comparator models and the random baseline. We subsequently evaluated scGPA using a public osteosarcoma single-cell dataset and performed qRT-PCR validation in 143B osteosarcoma cells. Among genes with significant experimental changes, scGPA achieved a directional concordance of 76.9%. When all tested downstream genes were counted, 37.0% were directionally correct, 51.9% showed no significant change and 11.1% changed in the opposite direction.
CONCLUSIONS: scGPA provides a practical workflow system for predicting and prioritizing direction-specific downstream transcriptional responses after target-gene perturbation. By integrating single-cell regulatory network inference, signed virtual perturbation and LLM-assisted interpretation, scGPA supports target-gene function inference and downstream mechanistic investigation from single-cell transcriptomic data.