MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100715

Медицинская библиотека · JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026

Do ChatGPT and Gemini provide accurate answers to patient questions about glenohumeral arthritis?

Ohlsen Suzanna M, Pirkle Sarah B, Yang JaeWon, Gee Albert O, Hsu Jason E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, enables large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini to analyze data, learn from context, and generate responses without explicit programming. While machine learning and LLMs show promise in orthopedic image analysis and patient education, it is unclear whether LLMs provide accurate responses to patient queries.

METHODS

Our purpose was to evaluate the alignment of ChatGPT and Gemini's recommendations for managing glenohumeral arthritis with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Both ChatGPT and Gemini were asked questions based on strong- or moderate-strength recommendations from the AAOS CPG on management of glenohumeral arthritis. Responses were classified by 2 independent reviewers as "agree," "neutral," or "disagree" based on their alignment with the CPG recommendations. A Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess interobserver reliability, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare the accuracy of responses between LLMs.

RESULTS

Of the 12 recommendations of strong- or moderate-strength evidence, ChatGPT and Gemini provided responses that were in agreement for 6 (50%) and 9 (75%) of recommendations, respectively. There were no significant differences in performance between ChatGPT and Gemini. ChatGPT provided 6 study references, of which 4 were nonexistent or inappropriately cited. Gemini provided 32 study references, of which 5 studies were nonexistent or inappropriately cited.

CONCLUSION

Both ChatGPT and Gemini do not consistently provide responses that align with the AAOS CPG for management of glenohumeral arthritis. Responses frequently included confabulated details or inappropriately referenced articles. Consequently, physicians and patients should use these artificial intelligence platforms with caution when seeking advice on management of glenohumeral arthritis.

Для цитирования: Ohlsen Suzanna M, Pirkle Sarah B, Yang JaeWon, Gee Albert O, Hsu Jason E. Do ChatGPT and Gemini provide accurate answers to patient questions about glenohumeral arthritis?. JSES reviews, reports, and techniques. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100715.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.