MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003

Медицинская библиотека · The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2024

Incidence and risk factors for complications following cervical epidural steroid injections.

Wadhwa Harsh, Rohde Matthew, Koltsov Jayme C B, Cabell Akaila, Smuck Matthew, Hu Serena S, Kleimeyer John P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are commonly used in management of cervical pathology. While severe complications have been reported, they are rare, and thus their incidence and risk factors have not been well characterized.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of complications 7, 30, and 90 days after CESI and to identify associated risk factors.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of a large, national administrative claims database (MeritiveTM Marketscan®).

PATIENT SAMPLE: The study included 229,412 patients (mean age 52.2 ± 11.3 years, 57.1% female) undergoing 448,209 CESIs from 2008 to 2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Complication rates following CESI, and risk factors for complication.

METHODS

Adults undergoing a CESI with active enrollment for one year prior to and 90 days after CESI were included. Patients with neoplasm, fracture, infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy or prior cervical surgery within one year preceding CESI were excluded. Multivariable repeated measures logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for complications at 7, 30, and 90 days. Complications were stratified into procedural and medical complications. Each time point was modeled separately with Bonferroni adjustment for the multiple time points.

RESULTS

Complications increased from 1.7% to 4.1%, to 8.0% within 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Procedural complications occurred in 0.6% of cases within 7 days, with neurologic complications occurring in 0.5% of cases. Medical complications occurred in 1.1%, 3.6%, and 7.2% within 7, 30 and 90 days, respectively. After multivariable risk adjustment, a transforaminal approach was associated with greater odd for procedural complications within 7 days relative to an interlaminar approach (p<.001), with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.55 (1.35, 1.77). The transforaminal approach also was associated with greater odds of neurologic complications at 7 days [1.69 (1.45, 1.95); p<.001]. A myelopathy diagnosis was not associated with risk of overall, procedural, medical, or neurological complications. The most influential factors independently associated with greater odds of any complication within 30 days included anticoagulant prescription [5.40 (4.55, 6.41); p<.001] and history of venous thromboembolism [3.01 (2.40, 3.77); p<.001]. The factors most strongly associated with procedural complications at 7 days included history of neurologic deficit [3.04 (2.65, 3.50); p<.001] and antiplatelet medication prescription [2.21 (1.49, 3.27); p=.003].

CONCLUSIONS

Complications following CESIs are infrequent. Neurologic complications were most common among procedural complications at 0.5% at 7 days. The transforaminal approach was associated with higher procedural complication rate compared to the interlaminar approach. Procedural and neurological complications were also associated with multiple factors including obesity, existing neurologic deficit, anxiety, and antiplatelet medication prescription. Attention should be given to these factors to mitigate procedural complications.

Для цитирования: Wadhwa Harsh, Rohde Matthew, Koltsov Jayme C B, Cabell Akaila, Smuck Matthew, Hu Serena S, Kleimeyer John P. Incidence and risk factors for complications following cervical epidural steroid injections.. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.