Management of acute grade IV and greater acromioclavicular dislocations: Open acromioclavicular brace versus arthroscopic double DogBone® endobutton.

INTRODUCTION

Several surgical techniques exist to manage grade IV acute acromioclavicular dislocation (ACD). However, the conventional acromioclavicular brace technique (ACB) has never been compared to the arthroscopic DogBone® (DB) double endobutton technique. The aim of this work was to compare the functional and radiological results of DB stabilization with those of ACB.

HYPOTHESIS: DB stabilization provides similar functional results with a low rate of radiological recurrences compared to ACB.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

This is a case-control study comparing 17 cases of ACD operated by DB (DB group) between January 2016 and January 2021 with 31 cases of ACD operated by ACB (ACB group) between January 2008 and January 2016. The primary outcome was the difference in the D/A ratio (reflecting vertical displacement) measured on an anteroposterior acromioclavicular (AC) X-ray compared between the 2 groups at one-year after surgery. The secondary outcome was a clinical evaluation at one-year using the Constant score and clinical AC instability.

RESULTS

At revision, the mean D/A ratio in the DB and ACB groups was 0.4±0.5 [-0.4-1.6] and 1.6±0.3 [0.8-3.1] respectively (p>0.05). Two patients (11.7%) in the DB group had implant migration with radiological recurrence while 14 patients (33%) had radiological recurrence in the ACB group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The DB technique limits the radiographic recurrence of acute ACD with an equivalent functional result at 1-year postoperatively compared to the conventional ACB technique, which implicitly requires a second operation for hardware removal. The DB technique has become the technique of choice in first-line treatment of acute grade IV ACD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective case-control series.