Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2022
Comparing exercises with and without electromyographic biofeedback in subacromial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Oliveira Araken Kleber Azevedo, da Costa Karinna Sonálya Aires, de Lucena Gildásio Lucas, de Oliveira Sousa Catarina, Filho João Felipe Medeiros, Brasileiro Jamilson Simões
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Deficits in movement and muscle activation of scapulohumeral joint are related to Subacromial Pain Syndrome. Electromyography biofeedback during exercise may enhance muscle activation and coordination, and consequently improve pain and shoulder function.
METHODS: This study compared the effects of an exercise protocol with and without using electromyographic biofeedback on pain, function and movement of the shoulder complex in subjects with Subacromial Pain Syndrome. A total of 24 patients with subacromial pain (mean age = 46.2 + 8.1;18 women) were randomized to either therapeutic exercise or exercise plus biofeedback to the trapezius and serratus muscles. Pain and shoulder function were evaluated as the primary outcome and range of motion, muscle strength, electromyographic activity and scapulohumeral kinematics as secondary outcomes. The subjects underwent eight weeks of intervention and comparisons were made between groups in baseline, at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and at 4 weeks post intervention.
FINDINGS: There were differences between groups for pain [mean difference = 1.5 (CI 0.3, 3.2) p = 0.01] at 8 weeks in the Exercise group and scapular upward rotation at 60° of arm elevation [mean difference = 13.9 (CI 0.9, 9.3), p = 0.006] in the Biofeedback group. There was no difference for the other variables of scapular kinematics as well as for shoulder function (DASH), muscle strength, range of motion and electromyographic variables.
INTERPRETATION: The addition of Biofeedback to the exercise protocol increased upward rotation of the scapula. However, the volunteers who performed only the Exercises had a better response in reducing pain.
METHODS: This study compared the effects of an exercise protocol with and without using electromyographic biofeedback on pain, function and movement of the shoulder complex in subjects with Subacromial Pain Syndrome. A total of 24 patients with subacromial pain (mean age = 46.2 + 8.1;18 women) were randomized to either therapeutic exercise or exercise plus biofeedback to the trapezius and serratus muscles. Pain and shoulder function were evaluated as the primary outcome and range of motion, muscle strength, electromyographic activity and scapulohumeral kinematics as secondary outcomes. The subjects underwent eight weeks of intervention and comparisons were made between groups in baseline, at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and at 4 weeks post intervention.
FINDINGS: There were differences between groups for pain [mean difference = 1.5 (CI 0.3, 3.2) p = 0.01] at 8 weeks in the Exercise group and scapular upward rotation at 60° of arm elevation [mean difference = 13.9 (CI 0.9, 9.3), p = 0.006] in the Biofeedback group. There was no difference for the other variables of scapular kinematics as well as for shoulder function (DASH), muscle strength, range of motion and electromyographic variables.
INTERPRETATION: The addition of Biofeedback to the exercise protocol increased upward rotation of the scapula. However, the volunteers who performed only the Exercises had a better response in reducing pain.