The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland · 2024
Comparative surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated posterior spinal fusions in ankylosing spondylitis patients.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marland Harry, McDonnell Jake M, Hughes Lauren, Morrison Cronan, Wilson Kielan V, Cunniffe Gráinne, Morris Seamus, Darwish Stacey, Butler Joseph S
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients with acute spinal fractures represent a challenge for practicing spine surgeons due to difficult operative anatomy and susceptibility to complications.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Does intraoperative CT-navigation improve outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing surgery?
METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out at our centre from 05/2016-06/2021 to identify AS patients presenting with a traumatic spinal fracture, managed surgically with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Cohorts were categorised and compared for outcomes based on those who underwent PSF with intraoperative CT-navigation versus those surgically managed with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy.
RESULTS: 37 AS patients were identified. 29/37 (78.4%) underwent PSF. Intraoperative navigation was used in 14 (48.3%) cases. Mean age of the entire cohort was 67.6 years. No difference existed between the navigated and non-navigated groups for mean levels fused (5.35 vs 5.07; p = 0.31), length of operation (217.9mins vs 175.3mins; p = 0.07), overall length-of-stay (12 days vs 21.9 days; p = 0.16), patients requiring HDU (3/14 vs 5/15; p = 0.09) or ICU (5/14 vs 9/15; p = 0.10), postoperative neurological improvement (1/14 vs 1/15; p = 0.48) or deterioration (1/14 vs 0/15; p = 0.15), intraoperative complications (2/14 vs 3/15; p = 0.34), postoperative complications 4/14 vs 4/15; p = 0.46), revision surgeries (3/14 vs 1/15; p = 0.16) and 30-day mortality (0/14 vs 0/15).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study that compares surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated PSFs for AS patients with an acute spinal fracture. Although limited by its retrospective design and sample size, this study highlights the non-inferiority of intraoperative navigation as a surgical aid in a challenging cohort.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Does intraoperative CT-navigation improve outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing surgery?
METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out at our centre from 05/2016-06/2021 to identify AS patients presenting with a traumatic spinal fracture, managed surgically with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Cohorts were categorised and compared for outcomes based on those who underwent PSF with intraoperative CT-navigation versus those surgically managed with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy.
RESULTS: 37 AS patients were identified. 29/37 (78.4%) underwent PSF. Intraoperative navigation was used in 14 (48.3%) cases. Mean age of the entire cohort was 67.6 years. No difference existed between the navigated and non-navigated groups for mean levels fused (5.35 vs 5.07; p = 0.31), length of operation (217.9mins vs 175.3mins; p = 0.07), overall length-of-stay (12 days vs 21.9 days; p = 0.16), patients requiring HDU (3/14 vs 5/15; p = 0.09) or ICU (5/14 vs 9/15; p = 0.10), postoperative neurological improvement (1/14 vs 1/15; p = 0.48) or deterioration (1/14 vs 0/15; p = 0.15), intraoperative complications (2/14 vs 3/15; p = 0.34), postoperative complications 4/14 vs 4/15; p = 0.46), revision surgeries (3/14 vs 1/15; p = 0.16) and 30-day mortality (0/14 vs 0/15).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study that compares surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated PSFs for AS patients with an acute spinal fracture. Although limited by its retrospective design and sample size, this study highlights the non-inferiority of intraoperative navigation as a surgical aid in a challenging cohort.