Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2019
Functional analysis of synovial fluid from osteoarthritic knee and carpometacarpal joints unravels different molecular profiles.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barreto Goncalo, Soliymani Rabah, Baumann Marc, Waris Eero, Eklund Kari K, Zenobi-Wong Marcy, Lalowski Maciej
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In this work, we aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms driving primary OA. By studying the dynamics of protein expression in two different types of OA joints we searched for similarities and disparities to identify key molecular mechanisms driving OA.
METHODS: For this purpose, human SF samples were obtained from CMC-I OA and knee joint of OA patients. SF samples were analysed by label-free quantitative liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Disease-relevant proteins identified in proteomics studies, such as clusterin, paraoxonase/arylesterase 1 (PON1) and transthyretin were validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and on the mRNA level by droplet digital PCR. Functional studies were performed in vitro using primary chondrocytes.
RESULTS: Differential proteomic changes were observed in the concentration of 40 proteins including clusterin, PON1 and transthyretin. Immunoassay analyses of clusterin, PON1, transthyretin and other inflammatory cytokines confirmed significant differences in protein concentration in SF of CMC-I and knee OA patients, with primarily lower protein expression levels in CMC-I. Functional studies on chondrocytes unequivocally demonstrated that stimulation with SF obtained from knee OA, in contrast to CMC-I OA joint, caused a significant upregulation in pro-inflammatory response, cell death and hypertrophy.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that differential expression of molecular players in SF from different OA joints evokes diverse effects on primary chondrocytes. The pathomolecular mechanisms of OA may significantly differ in various joints, a finding that brings a new dimension into the pathogenesis of primary OA.
METHODS: For this purpose, human SF samples were obtained from CMC-I OA and knee joint of OA patients. SF samples were analysed by label-free quantitative liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Disease-relevant proteins identified in proteomics studies, such as clusterin, paraoxonase/arylesterase 1 (PON1) and transthyretin were validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and on the mRNA level by droplet digital PCR. Functional studies were performed in vitro using primary chondrocytes.
RESULTS: Differential proteomic changes were observed in the concentration of 40 proteins including clusterin, PON1 and transthyretin. Immunoassay analyses of clusterin, PON1, transthyretin and other inflammatory cytokines confirmed significant differences in protein concentration in SF of CMC-I and knee OA patients, with primarily lower protein expression levels in CMC-I. Functional studies on chondrocytes unequivocally demonstrated that stimulation with SF obtained from knee OA, in contrast to CMC-I OA joint, caused a significant upregulation in pro-inflammatory response, cell death and hypertrophy.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that differential expression of molecular players in SF from different OA joints evokes diverse effects on primary chondrocytes. The pathomolecular mechanisms of OA may significantly differ in various joints, a finding that brings a new dimension into the pathogenesis of primary OA.