MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527853

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in public health · 2025

Professionalism vs. engagement: quality of SSc information on WeChat.

Wang Lei, Xiong Yue, Wu Tingting, Gao Yingying, Chen Haojie, Chu Xin, Zhu Baofeng, Cao Jing, Cheng Tao, Wang Mingjun

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease, and WeChat is a major source of health information in China. This study assesses the quality of SSc information on WeChat to understand its impact on public knowledge and engagement.

METHODS

A total of 375 articles from 9 WeChat public accounts were systematically analyzed using the DISCERN and Global Quality Scale (GQS) tools. Article quality was evaluated based on source credibility, content accuracy, and user engagement, including metrics such as views, likes, and comments.

RESULTS

Individual authors posted 50% of the articles, while non-profit organizations posted 21%, with non-profits providing higher quality content. Disease knowledge dominated (52.8%), yet readers showed higher interest in policy interpretation and rehabilitation. The average DISCERN and GQS scores were 28.96 and 1.62, indicating low quality across articles.

CONCLUSION

While WeChat facilitates SSc information dissemination, the overall quality is lacking. Enhancing professionalism and interactivity on health information platforms like WeChat could better meet the needs of patients and the public for reliable information.

Для цитирования: Wang Lei, Xiong Yue, Wu Tingting, Gao Yingying, Chen Haojie, Chu Xin, Zhu Baofeng, Cao Jing, Cheng Tao, Wang Mingjun. Professionalism vs. engagement: quality of SSc information on WeChat.. Frontiers in public health. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527853.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.