MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3889/oamjms.2018.107

Медицинская библиотека · Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018

The Effect of Technological Devices on Cervical Lordosis.

Öğrenci Ahmet, Koban Orkun, Yaman Onur, Dalbayrak Sedat, Yılmaz Mesut

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: There is a need for cervical flexion and even cervical hyperflexion for the use of technological devices, especially mobile phones. We investigated the effect of this use on the cervical lordosis angle.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A group of 156 patients who applied with only neck pain between 2013-2016 and had no additional problems were included. Patients are specifically questioned about mobile phone, tablet, and other devices usage. The value obtained by multiplying the year of usage and the average usage (hour) in daily life was determined as the total usage value (an average hour per day x year: hy). Cervical lordosis angles were statistically compared with the total time of use.

RESULTS

In the general ROC analysis, the cut-off value was found to be 20.5 hy. When the cut-off value is tested, the overall accuracy is very good with 72.4%. The true estimate of true risk and non-risk is quite high. The ROC analysis is statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The use of computing devices, especially mobile telephones, and the increase in the flexion of the cervical spine indicate that cervical vertebral problems will increase even in younger people in future. Also, to using with attention at this point, ergonomic devices must also be developed.

Для цитирования: Öğrenci Ahmet, Koban Orkun, Yaman Onur, Dalbayrak Sedat, Yılmaz Mesut. The Effect of Technological Devices on Cervical Lordosis.. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2018. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.107.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.