Molecular nutrition & food research · 2020
Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acids Differentially Alter Gut Microbiome and Reverse High-Fat Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhuang Pan, Zhang Yu, Shou Qiyang, Li Haoyu, Zhu Ya'er, He Lilin, Chen Jingnan, Jiao Jingjing
Аннотация
SCOPE: To assess the individual effects of dietary eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on insulin resistance (IR), gut microbiome, and gut metabolites in high-fat-diet-induced obese (DIO) mice.
METHODS AND RESULTS: DIO mice are fed an either high-fat diet (HFD), EPA (1% w/w) enriched HFD, or DHA (1% wt/wt) enriched HFD for 15 weeks. Both EPA and DHA supplements reverse hyperglycemia and IR but do not affect body weight in DIO mice while DHA exhibits a more pronounced ameliorative effect in male mice. Both EPA- and DHA-enriched Lactobacillus and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-producing species from Lachnospiraceae while reduced lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-producing Bilophila and Escherichia/Shigella. Compared with EPA, DHA-supplemented mice have more abundant propionic/butyric acid-producing bacteria, including Coprococcus, Butyricimonas synergistica, Bacteroides acidifaciens, and Intestinimonas, and less-abundant LPS-correlated species Streptococcus and p-75-a5. The shifts in gut microbiome co-occurred with the changes in levels of propionic/butyric acid, circulating LPS, and serotonin. Additionally, EPA/DHA supplementation attenuates adipose inflammation with upregulated glucose transporter 4 and Akt phosphorylation, indicating the improvement of insulin signaling.
CONCLUSION: EPA and DHA differentially reverse IR and relieve adipose inflammation while modulating gut microbiome and SCFAs/LPS production, underscoring the gut-adipose axis as a primary target of EPA/DHA.
METHODS AND RESULTS: DIO mice are fed an either high-fat diet (HFD), EPA (1% w/w) enriched HFD, or DHA (1% wt/wt) enriched HFD for 15 weeks. Both EPA and DHA supplements reverse hyperglycemia and IR but do not affect body weight in DIO mice while DHA exhibits a more pronounced ameliorative effect in male mice. Both EPA- and DHA-enriched Lactobacillus and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-producing species from Lachnospiraceae while reduced lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-producing Bilophila and Escherichia/Shigella. Compared with EPA, DHA-supplemented mice have more abundant propionic/butyric acid-producing bacteria, including Coprococcus, Butyricimonas synergistica, Bacteroides acidifaciens, and Intestinimonas, and less-abundant LPS-correlated species Streptococcus and p-75-a5. The shifts in gut microbiome co-occurred with the changes in levels of propionic/butyric acid, circulating LPS, and serotonin. Additionally, EPA/DHA supplementation attenuates adipose inflammation with upregulated glucose transporter 4 and Akt phosphorylation, indicating the improvement of insulin signaling.
CONCLUSION: EPA and DHA differentially reverse IR and relieve adipose inflammation while modulating gut microbiome and SCFAs/LPS production, underscoring the gut-adipose axis as a primary target of EPA/DHA.