MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.73.930

Медицинская библиотека · Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases · 1999

[Two cases of suspected Bartonella henselae infection from a dog].

Kusaba N, Yoshida H, Shimokawa Y, Sata M

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 55-year-old male was admitted to our hospital because of fever and left submaxillary, right axillary, and left inguinal lymphadenopathy. A presumptive diagnosis of rickettsiosis was made and treatment with oral doxycycline was started. Lymphadenopathy was partialy resolved after antibiotics treatment. Ablation of the left inguinal node was done and histopathological examination showed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Lymphadenopathy was resolved by chemotherapy. The second patient, a 40-year-old male, developed a tender submandibular node. Excisional biopsy of the node was performed to eliminate lymphoma. Histopathological examination revealed granulomatous lymphadenitis with follicular hyperplasia. The patients had no history of cat contact, but owned a dog. Diagnosis of both cases was confirmed by the detection of IgG antibodies to Bartonella henselae with an enzyme immunoassay. Our findings suggest that dogs are implicated in B. henselae infection and can serve as a reservoir of the organism as well as cats. In the abscence of other bacterial and especially after exposure to dogs, B. henselae should be included as possible cause of lymphadenopathy.

Для цитирования: Kusaba N, Yoshida H, Shimokawa Y, Sata M. [Two cases of suspected Bartonella henselae infection from a dog].. Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. 1999. DOI: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.73.930.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.