Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2016
[RESEARCH PROGRESS OF INTERSPINOUS DISTRACTION DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cheng Fei, Zhang Changchun, Zhu Kun, Xu Gang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To review the research status in respect of interspinous distraction devices (IDD) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).
METHODS: Recent original articles related to IDD in the treatment of DLSS were retrieved extensively, and the effectiveness was analyzed and summarized.
RESULTS: Its short-term effectiveness was superior to that of conservative treatment, no significant difference was found when compared with decompression or fusion alone. Its complication rate was higher than that of decompression or fusion alone, although complication dose not significantly affect treatment results, it still will increase the medical care cost of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: IDD is appropriate for patients who have failed to nonoperative treatment measures and can not tolerate open surgery, but the long-term effectiveness and durability of IDD need further research.
METHODS: Recent original articles related to IDD in the treatment of DLSS were retrieved extensively, and the effectiveness was analyzed and summarized.
RESULTS: Its short-term effectiveness was superior to that of conservative treatment, no significant difference was found when compared with decompression or fusion alone. Its complication rate was higher than that of decompression or fusion alone, although complication dose not significantly affect treatment results, it still will increase the medical care cost of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: IDD is appropriate for patients who have failed to nonoperative treatment measures and can not tolerate open surgery, but the long-term effectiveness and durability of IDD need further research.