The Knee · 2026
Time-zero quantitative pivot-shift after combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction in pivot-shift grade 2-3 knees: single- versus double-bundle hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fukushima Hiroaki, Hanaki Shunta, Abe Kensaku, Ota Kyohei, Shimoda Masayasu, Matsumoto Koshiro, Kobayashi Makoto, Kawanishi Yusuke, Kato Jiro, Yoshida Masahito, Takenaga Tetsuya, Murakami Hideki, Nozaki Masahiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lateral extra-articular procedures are increasingly used to improve rotational stability during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), particularly in high-grade pivot-shift knees. However, whether concomitant anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) provides different intraoperative (time-zero) rotational stability when combined with single-bundle (SB) versus double-bundle (DB) hamstring ACLR remains unclear. We compared stepwise intraoperative laxity in pivot-shift grade 2-3 knees under anesthesia.
METHODS: Consecutive primary hamstrings ACLR with concomitant ALLR were retrospectively reviewed. Laxity was assessed at baseline (before incision), after ACLR, and after ACLR + ALLR. Rotational laxity was quantified using an inertial sensor as injured-to-contralateral ratios for tibial acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV). Anterior laxity was side-to-side anterior tibial translation (ATT) using a Rolimeter. Linear mixed-effects models tested stage, technique, and their interaction; a prespecified analysis of covariance adjusted for the post-ACLR value.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included (SB, n = 33; DB, n = 31). Baseline instability was greater in DB (pivot-shift grade 3: 83.9% vs 45.5%, P = 0.002). Rotational laxity improved stepwise in both groups and decreased further after ALLR. At the final stage, DB showed higher acceleration and ERAV ratios (P = 0.016 and P = 0.034); ATT did not differ (P = 0.551). Stage × technique interactions were significant for both rotational metrics (both P < 0.001). In the adjusted analysis, between-group differences were not significant (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In pivot-shift grade 2-3 knees undergoing ACLR with ALLR, rotational laxity improved stepwise and decreased further after ALLR regardless of the intra-articular technique. After adjustment for post-ACLR residual laxity, no significant between-technique differences were observed at time zero.
METHODS: Consecutive primary hamstrings ACLR with concomitant ALLR were retrospectively reviewed. Laxity was assessed at baseline (before incision), after ACLR, and after ACLR + ALLR. Rotational laxity was quantified using an inertial sensor as injured-to-contralateral ratios for tibial acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV). Anterior laxity was side-to-side anterior tibial translation (ATT) using a Rolimeter. Linear mixed-effects models tested stage, technique, and their interaction; a prespecified analysis of covariance adjusted for the post-ACLR value.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included (SB, n = 33; DB, n = 31). Baseline instability was greater in DB (pivot-shift grade 3: 83.9% vs 45.5%, P = 0.002). Rotational laxity improved stepwise in both groups and decreased further after ALLR. At the final stage, DB showed higher acceleration and ERAV ratios (P = 0.016 and P = 0.034); ATT did not differ (P = 0.551). Stage × technique interactions were significant for both rotational metrics (both P < 0.001). In the adjusted analysis, between-group differences were not significant (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In pivot-shift grade 2-3 knees undergoing ACLR with ALLR, rotational laxity improved stepwise and decreased further after ALLR regardless of the intra-articular technique. After adjustment for post-ACLR residual laxity, no significant between-technique differences were observed at time zero.