Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2026
Effectiveness of exercise therapy versus passive conservative treatments for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Jinde, Tang Di, Hu Rui, Dai Zihan, Liu Yanhao, Ma Ruisi, Wan Kewen, Rong Xiaohan, Sun Jianbing, Wang Lin, Kong Bin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Exercise therapy is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP), yet its effectiveness versus passive conservative treatments is uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy versus passive conservative treatments in individuals with RCRSP.
METHODS: Five databases were searched from inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing exercise therapy with non-exercise-based conservative treatments were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool and the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: Of 10546 records identified, 19 studies (n = 1349) were included in the meta-analysis. No differences in pain (SMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -1.25 to 0.96) or disability (SMD, -0.06; 95% CI, -1.57 to 1.45) were observed between exercise therapy and passive physical therapy in the short term. Exercise therapy combined with passive physical therapy was not more effective for pain and disability than passive physical therapy (pain: SMD, 0.23; 95% CI, -0.88 to 1.33; disability: SMD, -0.44; 95% CI, -1.64 to 0.77) or injections alone (pain: SMD, 0.02; 95% CI, -1.12 to 1.17; disability: SMD, -0.36; 95% CI, -1.38 to 0.66) in the short term. Exercise therapy combined with education was not superior to education alone for disability in the short term (SMD, -0.36; 95% CI, -1.54 to 0.83). The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low.
CONCLUSION: Exercise therapy, alone or in combination with other conservative treatments, may not be more effective than passive conservative treatments for managing RCRSP at short-term follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy versus passive conservative treatments in individuals with RCRSP.
METHODS: Five databases were searched from inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing exercise therapy with non-exercise-based conservative treatments were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool and the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: Of 10546 records identified, 19 studies (n = 1349) were included in the meta-analysis. No differences in pain (SMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -1.25 to 0.96) or disability (SMD, -0.06; 95% CI, -1.57 to 1.45) were observed between exercise therapy and passive physical therapy in the short term. Exercise therapy combined with passive physical therapy was not more effective for pain and disability than passive physical therapy (pain: SMD, 0.23; 95% CI, -0.88 to 1.33; disability: SMD, -0.44; 95% CI, -1.64 to 0.77) or injections alone (pain: SMD, 0.02; 95% CI, -1.12 to 1.17; disability: SMD, -0.36; 95% CI, -1.38 to 0.66) in the short term. Exercise therapy combined with education was not superior to education alone for disability in the short term (SMD, -0.36; 95% CI, -1.54 to 0.83). The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low.
CONCLUSION: Exercise therapy, alone or in combination with other conservative treatments, may not be more effective than passive conservative treatments for managing RCRSP at short-term follow-up.