DOI 10.1097/rhu.0000000000002323
How Do Patient Decision Aids Enable Purposeful Shared Decision-Making in Rheumatology? An Integrative Review.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process in which patients and clinicians work together to make health care decisions. Purposeful SDM (PSDM) is a problem-based approach that emphasizes the multifaceted nature of SDM in response to different settings and contexts. In this integrative review, we systematically identify rheumatology patient decision aids (PDAs) described in peer-reviewed published literature and assess how they support PSDM.
METHODS
Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from 1948 to 2023. This search was supplemented through contacting authors and scanning references. The research team analyzed and classified PDAs into 1 of 4 modes. In addition, research team members utilized the SUNDAE Checklist (Standards for UNiversal reporting of Patient Decision Aid Evaluation), a 26-item checklist to assess the quality of manuscripts evaluating PDAs.
RESULTS
Forty-six records met the inclusion criteria. Among the 23 articles containing original data, there were 21 PDAs. The most common conditions represented included rheumatoid arthritis (n=8), osteoarthritis (n=7), and lupus nephritis (n=3). Fifteen addressed weighing treatment options (mode 1), while only 6 addressed intra- or interpersonal conflict (mode 2) and 2 addressed problem-solving (Mode 3). The mean number of SUNDAE checklist criteria satisfied was 21.5 (±4.3).
CONCLUSIONS
There exist opportunities to develop and refine tools that (1) address PSDM modes beyond weighing treatment options, (2) cover a wider variety of rheumatologic conditions, and (3) more transparently report evaluation of PDA content, development, and delivery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.