Actas dermo-sifiliograficas · 2011
[Paramedian forehead flap for the reconstruction of extensive nasal defects].
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Belmar P, de Eusebio E, Sánchez C, Vergara A, Martín A, Juanes A, Jiménez E, Diez E, Pastor M A, Olivares M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Department of Dermatology at Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara in Spain is a referral center for Mohs micrographic surgery. Consequently, we are regularly faced with the problem of repairing large surgical defects on the nose. The paramedian forehead flap is currently one of the techniques of choice for the repair of such defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We review our experience in the repair of nasal defects using the paramedian forehead flap over the period from 2004 to 2008. We describe the surgical technique, complications, and final results.
RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age, 75.1 years) were treated using this flap. Two patients also required cartilage grafts and reconstruction of the internal nasal lining. The most common complications were bleeding (60%) and partial necrosis (10%). The final cosmetic and functional results were considered good or excellent in 90% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The forehead flap continues to be one of the best options for the closure of surgical defects of the nasal pyramid larger than 2 cm. Adequate knowledge and careful application of the technique allows excellent results to be obtained with few complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We review our experience in the repair of nasal defects using the paramedian forehead flap over the period from 2004 to 2008. We describe the surgical technique, complications, and final results.
RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age, 75.1 years) were treated using this flap. Two patients also required cartilage grafts and reconstruction of the internal nasal lining. The most common complications were bleeding (60%) and partial necrosis (10%). The final cosmetic and functional results were considered good or excellent in 90% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The forehead flap continues to be one of the best options for the closure of surgical defects of the nasal pyramid larger than 2 cm. Adequate knowledge and careful application of the technique allows excellent results to be obtained with few complications.