MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2016.08.006

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical radiology · 2016

Facet joint injection versus epidural steroid injection for lumbar spinal stenosis: intra-individual study.

Shim E, Lee J W, Lee E, Im T, Kang Y, Ahn J M, Kang H S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of facet joint injection (FJI) for patients with lumbar central canal stenosis (LCS) in comparison with epidural steroid injection (ESI) in the same individuals.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-two patients who underwent both FJI and ESI for LCS between January 2014 and December 2014 were considered for enrolment in the study. A radiologist retrospectively conducted a chart review and recorded which injection was chosen as the third injection after sequential injections of FJI and ESI, and why clinicians chose the particular injection method. The response was measured via the use of a five-point satisfaction scale.

RESULTS

Among 252 patients, only 73 patients were included in the study (the remaining patients did not fulfil the inclusion criteria). Out of 73 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; range, 49∼87 years), 50 patients had received a third injection, 33 patients (66%) underwent FJIs as a third injection. Out of 19 patients who had experienced an ineffective first ESI, 13 (68.4%) patients reported the second FJI as effective. Out of six patients for whom the first FJI had been ineffective, three (50%) patients reported the second ESI as effective.

CONCLUSION

FJIs can be administered as an alternative to ESIs in cases of LCS.

Для цитирования: Shim E, Lee J W, Lee E, Im T, Kang Y, Ahn J M, Kang H S. Facet joint injection versus epidural steroid injection for lumbar spinal stenosis: intra-individual study.. Clinical radiology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.08.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.