BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023
Treatment strategies for recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: relationship between cause of dislocation and type of revision surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Toyoda Takashi, Oe Kenichi, Iida Hirokazu, Nakamura Tomohisa, Okamoto Naofumi, Saito Takanori
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There are many therapeutic options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of revision surgery for dislocated hips.
METHODS: Between November 2001 and December 2020, 71 consecutive revision hip surgeries were performed at our institution for recurrent dislocation following THA. We conducted a retrospective study of all 65 patients (71 hips), who were followed for a mean of 4.7 ± 3.2 years (range, 1-14). The cohort included 48 women and 17 men, with a mean age of 71 ± 12.3 years (range, 34-92). The mean number of previous surgeries was 1.6 ± 1.1 (range, 1-5). From intraoperative findings, we created six categories of revision hip surgery for recurrent dislocation following THA: open reduction and internal fixation (2 hips); head change or liner change only (6 hips); cup change with increased head size only (14 hips); stem change only (7 hips); cup and stem change (24 hips); and conversion to constrained cup (18 hips). Prosthesis survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, with repeat revision surgery for re-dislocation or implant failure as the endpoint. A cox proportional hazards model was used for risk factors of re-revision surgery.
RESULTS: Re-dislocation occurred in 5 hips (7.0%) and implant failure in 1 hip (1.4%). The 10-year survival rate was 81.1% (95% confidence interval, 65.5-96.8). A Dorr classification of "positional" was a risk factor for re-revision surgery due to re-dislocation.
CONCLUSION: Clear understanding of the cause of dislocation is essential for optimizing revision procedures and improving the rate of successful outcomes.
METHODS: Between November 2001 and December 2020, 71 consecutive revision hip surgeries were performed at our institution for recurrent dislocation following THA. We conducted a retrospective study of all 65 patients (71 hips), who were followed for a mean of 4.7 ± 3.2 years (range, 1-14). The cohort included 48 women and 17 men, with a mean age of 71 ± 12.3 years (range, 34-92). The mean number of previous surgeries was 1.6 ± 1.1 (range, 1-5). From intraoperative findings, we created six categories of revision hip surgery for recurrent dislocation following THA: open reduction and internal fixation (2 hips); head change or liner change only (6 hips); cup change with increased head size only (14 hips); stem change only (7 hips); cup and stem change (24 hips); and conversion to constrained cup (18 hips). Prosthesis survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, with repeat revision surgery for re-dislocation or implant failure as the endpoint. A cox proportional hazards model was used for risk factors of re-revision surgery.
RESULTS: Re-dislocation occurred in 5 hips (7.0%) and implant failure in 1 hip (1.4%). The 10-year survival rate was 81.1% (95% confidence interval, 65.5-96.8). A Dorr classification of "positional" was a risk factor for re-revision surgery due to re-dislocation.
CONCLUSION: Clear understanding of the cause of dislocation is essential for optimizing revision procedures and improving the rate of successful outcomes.