Endocrine · 2023
The associations between uric acid with BMDs and risk of the 10-year probability of fractures in Chinese patients with T2DM stratified by age and gender.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Na, Wang Yan, Chen Yu, Guo Yu-Ning, Li Ren-Xuan, Zhou Yan-Man, Xu Jin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Accumulating evidence suggests that serum uric acid (SUA) plays a beneficial role in bone health in the general population through antioxidant mechanisms. However, there is controversy over the association between SUA and bone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to investigate the association of serum UA with BMDs and future fracture risks and its potential influencing factors in those patients.
METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study of 485 patients. BMDs at femoral neck (FN), Troch and the lumbar spine (LS) were measured by DXA. The 10-year probability of fracture risk was assessed using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). SUA level and other biochemical indexes were measured.
RESULTS: There were lower SUA concentrations in patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia compared with those in the normal group, which only existed in non-elderly men and elderly women with T2DM. After adjustment for potential confounders, SUA was positively associated with BMD and negatively with 10-year probability of fracture risk only in non-elderly men and elderly women with T2DM. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that SUA was an independent determinant of BMD and 10-year probability of fracture risk, which also occurred in the above patients.
CONCLUSION: These results implied that relatively high SUA is a protective factor for bone in T2DM patients, but the osteoprotective effect of SUA was mediated by age and gender, and persisted only in non-elderly men and elderly women. Large intervention studies are needed to further confirm the outcomes and provide possible explanations.
METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study of 485 patients. BMDs at femoral neck (FN), Troch and the lumbar spine (LS) were measured by DXA. The 10-year probability of fracture risk was assessed using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). SUA level and other biochemical indexes were measured.
RESULTS: There were lower SUA concentrations in patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia compared with those in the normal group, which only existed in non-elderly men and elderly women with T2DM. After adjustment for potential confounders, SUA was positively associated with BMD and negatively with 10-year probability of fracture risk only in non-elderly men and elderly women with T2DM. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that SUA was an independent determinant of BMD and 10-year probability of fracture risk, which also occurred in the above patients.
CONCLUSION: These results implied that relatively high SUA is a protective factor for bone in T2DM patients, but the osteoprotective effect of SUA was mediated by age and gender, and persisted only in non-elderly men and elderly women. Large intervention studies are needed to further confirm the outcomes and provide possible explanations.