Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2024
Fear of Reinjury, Psychological Factors, and Sport Played Have Negative Impact on Return to Sport Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ryan Patrick C, Ching Idaleen C, Ierulli Victoria K, Pickett Keith, Mulcahey Mary K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To analyze factors that affect return to sport after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), such as psychological factors, sport played, and a positive apprehension test following surgery, and to determine the average return to sport rates and time to return to sport.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies met the following criteria: patients underwent MPFLR for patellar instability, return to sport was recorded, and a factor that affected return to sport was mentioned. Search terms included medial patellofemoral ligament, tibial tubercle osteotomy, tibial tubercle transfer, return to play, and return to sport.
RESULTS: Eighteen of 632 identified studies met inclusion criteria, and 1,072 patients who underwent MFPLR were recorded. Return-to-sport rates and mean/median time ranged from 60.0% to 100% and 3 to 10.4 months, respectively. Of the patients, 55.6% to 84.0% returned to sport without decreasing the level of competition. Six of 12 studies (50.0%) reported fear of reinjury as the top reason for patients not returning or returning at a lower level of sport. Volleyball/handball had the lowest return to the same level following surgery (18.2%-50.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Athletes who underwent MPFLR following recurrent patellar instability returned to sport at a range of 60.0% to 100%. Return to sport at the same level or higher was found to have a lower maximum rate at 55.6% to 84.0%. Fear of reinjury and sport played were found to have a substantial impact on ability to return to sport. Surgeons can use this information to advise patients on expectations following surgery.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies met the following criteria: patients underwent MPFLR for patellar instability, return to sport was recorded, and a factor that affected return to sport was mentioned. Search terms included medial patellofemoral ligament, tibial tubercle osteotomy, tibial tubercle transfer, return to play, and return to sport.
RESULTS: Eighteen of 632 identified studies met inclusion criteria, and 1,072 patients who underwent MFPLR were recorded. Return-to-sport rates and mean/median time ranged from 60.0% to 100% and 3 to 10.4 months, respectively. Of the patients, 55.6% to 84.0% returned to sport without decreasing the level of competition. Six of 12 studies (50.0%) reported fear of reinjury as the top reason for patients not returning or returning at a lower level of sport. Volleyball/handball had the lowest return to the same level following surgery (18.2%-50.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Athletes who underwent MPFLR following recurrent patellar instability returned to sport at a range of 60.0% to 100%. Return to sport at the same level or higher was found to have a lower maximum rate at 55.6% to 84.0%. Fear of reinjury and sport played were found to have a substantial impact on ability to return to sport. Surgeons can use this information to advise patients on expectations following surgery.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.