Vaccine · 2004
Immunisation schedules for non-replicating nasal vaccines can be made simple by allowing time for development of immunological memory.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bakke Hilde, Setek Torhild N, Huynh Phuong N, Haugen Inger Lise, Høiby E Arne, Holst Johan, Aaberge Ingeborg S, Haneberg Bjørn
Аннотация
Mice immunised intranasally with multiple doses of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) from group B meningococci developed antibody responses that depended on the interval between doses. High levels of antibodies in saliva and extracts of faeces were induced within 4 weeks after an OMV vaccine had been given at weekly intervals, whereas the antibody responses in these samples were negligible when given four times at 1-day or 1-h intervals, or as one large dose. Only modest responses were obtained in serum after 4 weeks, however, whether the vaccine had been given repeatedly at any schedule, including the 1-week interval, or as one dose. On the other hand, two large doses given 8 weeks apart induced booster antibody responses in both serum and secretions that matched the responses from a second series of the four smaller doses. Intranasal immunisations may thus stimulate immunological memory more rapidly in secretions than in serum. In order to secure adequate systemic responses by a minimum of doses, nasal vaccines should therefore be given at intervals longer than 4 weeks, in harmony with the intervals recommended for injectable vaccines.