Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Adaptive Neuromuscular Co-Contraction Strategies Under Varying Approach Speeds and Distances During Single-Leg Jumping: An Exploratory Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tai Wei-Hsun, Peng Hsien-Te, Lin Jian-Zhi, Li Po-Ang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study investigated how variations in approach speed and distance influence lower-limb muscle activation, joint co-contraction ratios (CCRs), and mechanical joint stiffness during single-leg approach run jump landings (ARJSL), to clarify adaptive neuromuscular strategies for joint stiffness regulation.
METHODS: Twenty-five physically active male university students performed ARJSLs under six randomized conditions combining two approach speeds (fast > 4.0 m/s; slow < 4.0 m/s) and three approach distances (3, 6, and 9 m). Surface electromyography (sEMG) from five dominant-limb muscles-rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and soleus-was analyzed across three movement phases: pre-activation, downward (braking), and push-off. Knee and ankle CCRs were computed, while kinematic and kinetic data were used to calculate mechanical joint stiffness via inverse dynamics. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA evaluated the main and interaction effects of approach speed and distance.
RESULTS: Significant speed × distance interactions were observed for tibialis anterior activation, several CCRs, and eccentric ankle stiffness (p < 0.05). Pre-activation knee CCR increased with longer, faster approaches, indicating anticipatory joint pre-stiffening. During braking, greater ankle co-contraction under fast-9 m conditions coincided with reduced mechanical ankle stiffness, suggesting a compensatory yielding strategy under high kinetic loads. In the push-off phase, faster approaches elicited higher concentric stiffness at the hip and ankle, supporting efficient energy transfer. Rectus femoris and gastrocnemius activation scaled with both approach speed and distance.
CONCLUSIONS: Athletes adapt neuromuscular co-contraction and mechanical stiffness in a coordinated, phase-dependent manner to balance protection and performance. These insights may inform targeted training strategies for enhancing jump efficiency and mitigating ACL injury risk.
METHODS: Twenty-five physically active male university students performed ARJSLs under six randomized conditions combining two approach speeds (fast > 4.0 m/s; slow < 4.0 m/s) and three approach distances (3, 6, and 9 m). Surface electromyography (sEMG) from five dominant-limb muscles-rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and soleus-was analyzed across three movement phases: pre-activation, downward (braking), and push-off. Knee and ankle CCRs were computed, while kinematic and kinetic data were used to calculate mechanical joint stiffness via inverse dynamics. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA evaluated the main and interaction effects of approach speed and distance.
RESULTS: Significant speed × distance interactions were observed for tibialis anterior activation, several CCRs, and eccentric ankle stiffness (p < 0.05). Pre-activation knee CCR increased with longer, faster approaches, indicating anticipatory joint pre-stiffening. During braking, greater ankle co-contraction under fast-9 m conditions coincided with reduced mechanical ankle stiffness, suggesting a compensatory yielding strategy under high kinetic loads. In the push-off phase, faster approaches elicited higher concentric stiffness at the hip and ankle, supporting efficient energy transfer. Rectus femoris and gastrocnemius activation scaled with both approach speed and distance.
CONCLUSIONS: Athletes adapt neuromuscular co-contraction and mechanical stiffness in a coordinated, phase-dependent manner to balance protection and performance. These insights may inform targeted training strategies for enhancing jump efficiency and mitigating ACL injury risk.