Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2019
Temporal discrimination threshold and blink reflex recovery cycle in cervical dystonia - two sides of the same coin?
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Junker Johanna, Paulus Theresa, Brandt Valerie, Weissbach Anne, Tunc Sinem, Loens Sebastian, Reilly Richard B, Hutchinson Michael, Baumer Tobias
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Elevated temporal discrimination thresholds (TDT) have been found in cervical dystonia (CD) and unaffected first-degree relatives, indicating autosomal dominant inheritance with reduced penetrance, serving as an endophenotype and being indicative of abnormal inhibitory processing within the brainstem-basal ganglia circuits. The blink reflex R2 recovery cycle (BRRC) is also a measure of excitability of brainstem-basal ganglia circuits, and inconsistent findings are reported in CD. The aim was to investigate TDT and BRRC in CD and evaluate its reliability as an endophenotype.
METHODS: 29 patients with isolated cervical dystonia (mean age: 56.1 ± 14.3, female n = 18) and 29 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (mean age: 56.0 ± 14.2, female n = 18) were evaluated using a TDT-paradigm, performed as previously described by testing visual, tactile and visual-tactile temporal discrimination thresholds, and the BRRC, investigated with electrical and air puff stimulation.
RESULTS: Mean visual-tactile (p = 0.001) and visual TDTs (p = 0.015) differed between CD and controls; tactile TDTs revealed no group differences (p = 0.232). No between group differences were found for BRRC using either electrical or air puff stimulation (p = 0.117). There was no correlation between the elevation of TDTs and the degree of BRRC-inhibition in CD.
CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that the TDT is an endophenotype in CD. BRRC testing did not demonstrate disinhibition of brainstem-basal ganglia circuits in CD. In contrast to TDT, the BRRC seems not to represent an endophenotype in cervical dystonia.
METHODS: 29 patients with isolated cervical dystonia (mean age: 56.1 ± 14.3, female n = 18) and 29 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (mean age: 56.0 ± 14.2, female n = 18) were evaluated using a TDT-paradigm, performed as previously described by testing visual, tactile and visual-tactile temporal discrimination thresholds, and the BRRC, investigated with electrical and air puff stimulation.
RESULTS: Mean visual-tactile (p = 0.001) and visual TDTs (p = 0.015) differed between CD and controls; tactile TDTs revealed no group differences (p = 0.232). No between group differences were found for BRRC using either electrical or air puff stimulation (p = 0.117). There was no correlation between the elevation of TDTs and the degree of BRRC-inhibition in CD.
CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that the TDT is an endophenotype in CD. BRRC testing did not demonstrate disinhibition of brainstem-basal ganglia circuits in CD. In contrast to TDT, the BRRC seems not to represent an endophenotype in cervical dystonia.