Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2016
Open versus percutaneous release for trigger digits: Reversal between short-term and long-term outcomes.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Chin-Jung, Huang Hui-Kuang, Wang Shih-Tien, Huang Yi-Chao, Liu Chien-Lin, Wang Jung-Pan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There have been excellent outcomes reported with both open and percutaneous release of trigger finger. However, a comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between these two techniques has not been performed. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term (3 months) and long-term (2 years) outcomes between open surgical release and percutaneous needle release of trigger finger.
METHODS: Between 2009 and 2012, a total of 198 patients with trigger finger treated with either open (n = 72) or percutaneous (n = 126) release of the A1 pulley were enrolled in the study. Both short-term and long-term outcomes were evaluated, using the criteria established through Gilberts et al's questionnaire.
RESULTS: The short-term satisfaction of patients with their results was significantly better in the percutaneous release group, whereas the long-term satisfaction rates were better in the open-release group, although not at a statistically significant level.
CONCLUSION: The percutaneous release method to release trigger finger does not have a better long-term satisfaction rate than the open release approach, although percutaneous release has a significantly better short-term satisfaction rate.
METHODS: Between 2009 and 2012, a total of 198 patients with trigger finger treated with either open (n = 72) or percutaneous (n = 126) release of the A1 pulley were enrolled in the study. Both short-term and long-term outcomes were evaluated, using the criteria established through Gilberts et al's questionnaire.
RESULTS: The short-term satisfaction of patients with their results was significantly better in the percutaneous release group, whereas the long-term satisfaction rates were better in the open-release group, although not at a statistically significant level.
CONCLUSION: The percutaneous release method to release trigger finger does not have a better long-term satisfaction rate than the open release approach, although percutaneous release has a significantly better short-term satisfaction rate.