Pain medicine case reports · 2025
Percutaneous to Paddle Lead Revision in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Case Series.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Busch Nisha L, Hoffman Pauline R, Kusyk Dorian M, Patterson Michael, Tomycz Nestor D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves the placement of percutaneously placed cylindrical leads or surgically placed paddle leads to deliver electrical stimulation for pain relief. Although more invasive, paddle leads have been associated with less lead migration and revision. We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of SCS paddle lead implants performed by a single neurosurgeon.
CASE SERIES: Patients were contacted to complete a telephone questionnaire assessing postoperative outcomes. We identified n = 10 patients who underwent replacement of percutaneous SCS with paddle lead SCS. Six patients responded to the questionnaire after an average follow-up period of 37.67 ± 12.72 months. At long-term follow-up, 3/6 respondents reported significant pain relief, and 5/6 respondents reported a decreased need for pain medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparative outcome data on percutaneous vs paddle lead SCS is limited. Our experience has been that patients who fail percutaneous SCS may be salvaged with conversion to paddle leads with good outcomes.
CASE SERIES: Patients were contacted to complete a telephone questionnaire assessing postoperative outcomes. We identified n = 10 patients who underwent replacement of percutaneous SCS with paddle lead SCS. Six patients responded to the questionnaire after an average follow-up period of 37.67 ± 12.72 months. At long-term follow-up, 3/6 respondents reported significant pain relief, and 5/6 respondents reported a decreased need for pain medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparative outcome data on percutaneous vs paddle lead SCS is limited. Our experience has been that patients who fail percutaneous SCS may be salvaged with conversion to paddle leads with good outcomes.