Spine deformity · 2024
3D analysis of the preoperative deformity in AIS can be used to guide surgical treatment decisions for selective thoracic fusion.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Upasani Vidyadhar V, Bartley Carrie E, Bastrom Tracey P, George Stephen, Parent Stefan, Kelly Michael P, Newton Peter O
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To identify 3D measures of scoliosis from preoperative imaging that are associated with optimal radiographic outcomes after selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
METHODS: Subjects with primary thoracic curves (Lenke 1-4, B or C modifiers) fused selectively (L1 or above) who had preoperative 3D reconstructions and minimum 2 years of follow-up were included. An optimal outcome at 2 years was defined as having 4 of 5 parameters previously defined in the literature: (1) lumbar curve < 26º, (2) deformity flexibility quotient < 4, (3) C7-CSVL < 2 cm, (4) lumbar prominence < 5º and (5) trunk shift < 1.5 cm. Univariate and CART analyses were performed to identify preoperative variables associated with achieving an optimal outcome 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine (88F, 11 M) patients met inclusion. Mean age was 15 ± 2 years. Fifty-one subjects (52%) had an optimal outcome. Seven preoperative deformity measures representing smaller thoracolumbar/lumbar deformity in the optimal group were found to be significant on univariate analysis. CART analysis identified the following variables associated with optimal outcomes: difference in apical rotation > 30° = 27% optimal outcomes, difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex > 3° = 46% optimal outcomes, and difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex ≤ 3° = 80% optimal outcomes (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Optimal outcomes after STF were associated with a preoperative difference in apical vertebral rotation in the axial plane less than 30° between thoracic and lumbar curves as well as coronal plane vertebral wedging of the lumbar apical vertebra less than 3°.
METHODS: Subjects with primary thoracic curves (Lenke 1-4, B or C modifiers) fused selectively (L1 or above) who had preoperative 3D reconstructions and minimum 2 years of follow-up were included. An optimal outcome at 2 years was defined as having 4 of 5 parameters previously defined in the literature: (1) lumbar curve < 26º, (2) deformity flexibility quotient < 4, (3) C7-CSVL < 2 cm, (4) lumbar prominence < 5º and (5) trunk shift < 1.5 cm. Univariate and CART analyses were performed to identify preoperative variables associated with achieving an optimal outcome 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine (88F, 11 M) patients met inclusion. Mean age was 15 ± 2 years. Fifty-one subjects (52%) had an optimal outcome. Seven preoperative deformity measures representing smaller thoracolumbar/lumbar deformity in the optimal group were found to be significant on univariate analysis. CART analysis identified the following variables associated with optimal outcomes: difference in apical rotation > 30° = 27% optimal outcomes, difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex > 3° = 46% optimal outcomes, and difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex ≤ 3° = 80% optimal outcomes (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Optimal outcomes after STF were associated with a preoperative difference in apical vertebral rotation in the axial plane less than 30° between thoracic and lumbar curves as well as coronal plane vertebral wedging of the lumbar apical vertebra less than 3°.