Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2024
Impact of multi-rod reinforcement on rod fractures in adult spinal deformity: A retrospective case series with a minimum follow up of 5 years.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamato Yu, Hasegawa Tomohiko, Yoshida Go, Banno Tomohiro, Oe Shin, Arima Hideyuki, Ide Koichiro, Yamada Tomohiro, Kurosu Kenta, Nakai Keiichi, Matsuyama Yukihiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the impact of the multi-rod construct on rod fractures over a minimum follow-up period of five years in comparison to that with the conventional two-rod construct using the same technique, rod composition, and rod reinforcement method.
METHODS: Data were retrospectively retrieved from a prospectively collected, single-center database. Consecutive patients >50 years of age who underwent thoracopelvic corrective fusion with planned two-stage anterior-posterior surgery and were followed up for at least five years were included in this study. The incidence of rod fracture in the conventional two-rod and multi-rod groups was investigated.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (mean age, 68.9 years) were included in this study (follow-up rate, 73.4 %). Rod fracture was identified in 25 patients (43.1 %), within an average period of 25.1 months. The incidence of rod fracture in the multi-rod group was significantly lower than that in the two-rod group. However, there was no significant difference in the time to rod fracture between the two groups. Reinforcement of the multi-rod to the distal portion of the connector of the iliac screw had the lowest fracture rate and no cases of reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of rod fracture was significantly lower using multi-rod reinforcement, but the timing of rod fracture did not differ, compared to that with the two-rod construct using the same surgical technique and rod material. Multi-rod reinforcement covering the distal portion of the iliac screw is recommended to reduce the risk of fracture and reoperation.
METHODS: Data were retrospectively retrieved from a prospectively collected, single-center database. Consecutive patients >50 years of age who underwent thoracopelvic corrective fusion with planned two-stage anterior-posterior surgery and were followed up for at least five years were included in this study. The incidence of rod fracture in the conventional two-rod and multi-rod groups was investigated.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (mean age, 68.9 years) were included in this study (follow-up rate, 73.4 %). Rod fracture was identified in 25 patients (43.1 %), within an average period of 25.1 months. The incidence of rod fracture in the multi-rod group was significantly lower than that in the two-rod group. However, there was no significant difference in the time to rod fracture between the two groups. Reinforcement of the multi-rod to the distal portion of the connector of the iliac screw had the lowest fracture rate and no cases of reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of rod fracture was significantly lower using multi-rod reinforcement, but the timing of rod fracture did not differ, compared to that with the two-rod construct using the same surgical technique and rod material. Multi-rod reinforcement covering the distal portion of the iliac screw is recommended to reduce the risk of fracture and reoperation.