The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants · 2025
Long-Term Outcomes of Dental Implants Following Jaw Resection: A Comparative Analysis of Malignant Tumors and Benign Conditions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mukaibo Taro, Takahashi Osamu, Mitsugi Sho, Kondo Yusuke, Habu Manabu, Masaki Chihiro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the survival rates of dental implants used for functional rehabilitation following jaw resection due to malignant tumors versus other causes, including benign tumors, osteomyelitis, or trauma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 19 patients who underwent jaw resection and implant placement with bone anchored device for wide edentulous areas at XXX XXX University Hospital between June 2013 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: those with jaw defects due to malignant tumors (T1 group) and those with defects from benign tumors, facial trauma, or osteomyelitis (T2 group). Implant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, with multivariate analyses via Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and various clinical factors.
RESULTS: A total of 64 implants were placed, with 48.4% of defects caused by malignant tumors. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was 69.2% at the patient level and 64.5% at the implant level. A significant difference was observed between groups: the T1 group had a 5-year implant survival rate of 34.1% versus 92.3% in the T2 group (p<0.001). The T1 group was significantly older (67.7 ± 9.4 vs. 47.1 ± 15.3 years) and showed a distinct pattern of late failures between 40 and 50 months. Multivariate analyses showed that malignancy remained associated with implant failure across most models, with varying magnitude based on included factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed after jaw resection for malignant tumors showed significantly lower survival rates than those placed after resection for benign conditions. This difference persisted across most multivariate models, though the magnitude of association considerably varied depending on the examined factors. These findings provide the first direct comparison of implant outcomes based on resection pathology and highlight the complex factors influencing implant survival in post-oncologic reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 19 patients who underwent jaw resection and implant placement with bone anchored device for wide edentulous areas at XXX XXX University Hospital between June 2013 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: those with jaw defects due to malignant tumors (T1 group) and those with defects from benign tumors, facial trauma, or osteomyelitis (T2 group). Implant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, with multivariate analyses via Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and various clinical factors.
RESULTS: A total of 64 implants were placed, with 48.4% of defects caused by malignant tumors. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was 69.2% at the patient level and 64.5% at the implant level. A significant difference was observed between groups: the T1 group had a 5-year implant survival rate of 34.1% versus 92.3% in the T2 group (p<0.001). The T1 group was significantly older (67.7 ± 9.4 vs. 47.1 ± 15.3 years) and showed a distinct pattern of late failures between 40 and 50 months. Multivariate analyses showed that malignancy remained associated with implant failure across most models, with varying magnitude based on included factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed after jaw resection for malignant tumors showed significantly lower survival rates than those placed after resection for benign conditions. This difference persisted across most multivariate models, though the magnitude of association considerably varied depending on the examined factors. These findings provide the first direct comparison of implant outcomes based on resection pathology and highlight the complex factors influencing implant survival in post-oncologic reconstruction.