Spine deformity · 2015
Cross-Links Do Not Improve Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes of Posterior Spinal Fusion With Pedicle Screws in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garg Sumeet, Niswander Cameron, Pan Zhaoxing, Erickson Mark
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative analysis.
OBJECTIVES: Comparative analysis was performed to determine the differences, if any, between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with and without cross-links.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cross-links are frequently used during PSF for AIS. It is unclear whether they provide any advantage for patients with all-pedicle screw constructs.
METHODS: A prospectively collected multicenter database of patients with AIS undergoing spinal fusion was retrospectively queried. Study inclusion criteria were primary PSF with all-pedicle screw fixation (greater than 90% fixation points) and minimum 2 years' follow-up. Collected data included demographics, radiographic measures, complications, Scoliosis Research Society-22r and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) scores.
RESULTS: A total of 500 patients were included (377 cross-link and 123 non-cross-link). Age, body mass index, gender, and preoperative major Cobb angle were not different between groups. Except for a slightly decreased lumbar Cobb angle (2.7°) in the cross-link group, no other radiographic measures were different at follow-up. Complications were not significantly different between groups: 21 of 377 (6%) crosslink and 9 of 123 (7%) non-cross-link. Infection occurred in 1 patient in the cross-link group and none in the non-cross link group. Reoperation occurred in 4 patients, all with cross-links (3 for implant removal and 1 for distal adding-on). Scoliosis Research Society-22r scores, total and individual domains, improved by a similar amount in both groups. At follow-up, parent and patient SAQ appearance scores were not significantly different. The SAQ expectations domain scores were similar for all visits and improved for both patients and parents.
CONCLUSIONS: There do not appear to be significant clinical or radiographic outcome differences in patients with AIS undergoing PSF based on the use of cross-links at 2-year follow-up. Surgeons should consider eliminating cross-links in patients with AIS who have PSF with all-pedicle screw constructs. This may have substantial cost savings without affecting patient outcome.
OBJECTIVES: Comparative analysis was performed to determine the differences, if any, between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with and without cross-links.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cross-links are frequently used during PSF for AIS. It is unclear whether they provide any advantage for patients with all-pedicle screw constructs.
METHODS: A prospectively collected multicenter database of patients with AIS undergoing spinal fusion was retrospectively queried. Study inclusion criteria were primary PSF with all-pedicle screw fixation (greater than 90% fixation points) and minimum 2 years' follow-up. Collected data included demographics, radiographic measures, complications, Scoliosis Research Society-22r and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) scores.
RESULTS: A total of 500 patients were included (377 cross-link and 123 non-cross-link). Age, body mass index, gender, and preoperative major Cobb angle were not different between groups. Except for a slightly decreased lumbar Cobb angle (2.7°) in the cross-link group, no other radiographic measures were different at follow-up. Complications were not significantly different between groups: 21 of 377 (6%) crosslink and 9 of 123 (7%) non-cross-link. Infection occurred in 1 patient in the cross-link group and none in the non-cross link group. Reoperation occurred in 4 patients, all with cross-links (3 for implant removal and 1 for distal adding-on). Scoliosis Research Society-22r scores, total and individual domains, improved by a similar amount in both groups. At follow-up, parent and patient SAQ appearance scores were not significantly different. The SAQ expectations domain scores were similar for all visits and improved for both patients and parents.
CONCLUSIONS: There do not appear to be significant clinical or radiographic outcome differences in patients with AIS undergoing PSF based on the use of cross-links at 2-year follow-up. Surgeons should consider eliminating cross-links in patients with AIS who have PSF with all-pedicle screw constructs. This may have substantial cost savings without affecting patient outcome.