Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015
Comparison of Three Biochemical Tests for Rapid Detection of Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Poirel Laurent, Fernández Javier, Nordmann Patrice
Аннотация
Enterobacterial isolates producing clavulanic-inhibited extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) are increasingly spreading in the community and are often responsible for nosocomial infections. Rapid biochemical tests have been developed recently for their detection. Three tests, namely, the Rapid ESBL NDP test, the β-Lacta test, and the Rapid ESBL Screen, have been evaluated with a collection of 108 well-characterized strains, including wild-type strains, strains producing ESBLs, overexpressed cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases. The ESBL NDP test and the Rapid ESBL Screen (a copy of the ESBL NDP test) are aimed at detecting ESBL producers, while the β-Lacta test is aimed at detecting not only ESBL producers but also cephalosporinase and carbapenemase producers. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting ESBL producers (n = 60) were 95% and 100% for the Rapid ESBL NDP test, 80% and 87% (after 30 min) and 92% and 83% (after 2 h) for the Rapid ESBL Screen, and 88% and 71% for the β-Lacta test, respectively. Varied and time-consuming detection (up to 2 h) of ESBLs by the Rapid ESBL Screen and concomitant and varied detection of producers of AmpC and several types of carbapenemases correspond to significant shortcomings of using the Rapid Screen ESBL and β-Lacta tests, respectively.