MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2015

Collaborative care for a patient with complex low back pain and long-term tobacco use: a case report.

Seidman Michael B, Vining Robert D, Salsbury Stacie A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Few examples of interprofessional collaboration by chiropractors and other healthcare professionals are available. This case report describes an older adult with complex low back pain and longstanding tobacco use who received collaborative healthcare while enrolled in a clinical trial. This 65 year-old female retired office worker presented with chronic back pain. Imaging findings included disc extrusion and spinal stenosis. Multiple co-morbidities and the complex nature of this case substantiated the need for multidisciplinary collaboration. A doctor of chiropractic and a doctor of osteopathy provided collaborative care based on patient goal setting and supported by structured interdisciplinary communication, including record sharing and telephone consultations. Chiropractic and medical interventions included spinal manipulation, exercise, tobacco reduction counseling, analgesic use, nicotine replacement, dietary and ergonomic recommendations, and stress reduction strategies. Collaborative care facilitated active involvement of the patient and resulted in decreased radicular symptoms, improvements in activities of daily living, and tobacco use reduction.

Для цитирования: Seidman Michael B, Vining Robert D, Salsbury Stacie A. Collaborative care for a patient with complex low back pain and long-term tobacco use: a case report.. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2015.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.