MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12891-025-09279-3

Медицинская библиотека · BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025

Metatarsal coalition with pseudarthrosis mimicking bone tumor: two case reports and literature review.

Yu Dongping, Li Zhen

СтатьяКлинический случайОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Metatarsal coalition is an extremely rare congenital anomaly. Its complication with pseudarthrosis is even more exceptional and may present as a palpable dorsal mass or chronic pain, often mimicking a bone tumor. Awareness of this condition is essential for accurate diagnosis and to avoid unnecessary biopsies or overtreatment. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two cases of metatarsal coalition complicated by pseudarthrosis. The first case involved a 25-year-old woman with a 7-year history of a mildly painful dorsal foot mass. Imaging revealed a coalition between the first and second metatarsals, along with pseudarthrosis formation. The second case involved a 54-year-old man with long-standing dorsal foot pain due to coalition between the third and fourth metatarsals. Both patients underwent surgical excision, and histopathology confirmed fibro-osseous pseudarthrosis. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with complete resolution of symptoms. During clinical follow-up at 41 and 21 months, respectively, no signs of recurrence were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases highlight an uncommon presentation of metatarsal coalition mimicking bone neoplasms. Timely recognition and appropriate diagnostic workup are critical to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary intervention.

Для цитирования: Yu Dongping, Li Zhen. Metatarsal coalition with pseudarthrosis mimicking bone tumor: two case reports and literature review.. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-09279-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.