Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2015
Influence of spinopelvic parameters on non-operative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beyer F, Geier F, Bredow J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Sobottke R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Non-operative treatment is widely accepted for early stages of lumbar spinal stenosis. In general, a trial of conservative treatment is recommended prior to surgery.
OBJECTIVE: The influence of sagittal alignment on treatment outcomes remains unclear.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included in this prospective study. All patients received repeated epidural injections and facet joint injections as well as physiotherapy during a one week hospitalization. Patient characteristics, VAS scores, COMI scores, ODI scores and SF-36 were assessed prior to and immediately after treatment as well as after six, twelve, and 26 weeks. Spinopelvic parameter measurements were performed. Outcome parameters were correlated to spinopelvic parameters.
RESULTS: ODI and PCSS scores improved significantly up to three months follow-up. COMI score improved significantly over the entire follow-up. Back pain improvement at six weeks and three months follow-up correlated inversely with pelvic incidence. Sacral slope correlated significantly with ODI improvement immediately after therapy. Low lumbar lordosis also correlated significantly with ODI improvement at three months follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with higher pelvic incidence reported significantly greater back pain improvements at three months follow-up. ODI improvements were higher for patients with high sacral slope immediately after treatment and for patients with a higher lumbar lordosis after three months. No influence of sagittal alignment was observed on leg pain or quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: The influence of sagittal alignment on treatment outcomes remains unclear.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients were included in this prospective study. All patients received repeated epidural injections and facet joint injections as well as physiotherapy during a one week hospitalization. Patient characteristics, VAS scores, COMI scores, ODI scores and SF-36 were assessed prior to and immediately after treatment as well as after six, twelve, and 26 weeks. Spinopelvic parameter measurements were performed. Outcome parameters were correlated to spinopelvic parameters.
RESULTS: ODI and PCSS scores improved significantly up to three months follow-up. COMI score improved significantly over the entire follow-up. Back pain improvement at six weeks and three months follow-up correlated inversely with pelvic incidence. Sacral slope correlated significantly with ODI improvement immediately after therapy. Low lumbar lordosis also correlated significantly with ODI improvement at three months follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with higher pelvic incidence reported significantly greater back pain improvements at three months follow-up. ODI improvements were higher for patients with high sacral slope immediately after treatment and for patients with a higher lumbar lordosis after three months. No influence of sagittal alignment was observed on leg pain or quality of life.