Does approach for radial head repair in Bado II Monteggia variants affect outcome?

BACKGROUND

This study compares outcomes and complications of patients with Bado II Monteggia fracture-dislocations that required radial head fixation or replacement based upon approach to the radial head.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 159 consecutive patients with proximal ulna fractures and a radial head dislocation or fracture (Monteggia Variant). Injuries were classified by Bado type. Forty-one patients with Bado II Monteggia injuries treated with either a radial head replacement or fixation with complete follow up were included. Demographics, injury information, surgical details, and follow up information including elbow range of motion (ROM) and complications were collected. A trans-osseous posterior (TOP) approach working through the ulna fracture to address the radial head first was used in 19 patients, while 22 patients had their radial head treated via a separate lateral (Kocher) interval after ulnar fixation. Ulnar plate fixation was performed for all patients. Comparisons were made using independent t-tests.

RESULTS

Forty-one Monteggia lesions treated through TOP (19, 46 %) or Kocher (22, 64 %) approaches underwent a radial head replacement (33, 80.5 %) or fracture repair (8, 19.5 %) with a mean final follow-up of 15.3 months. At all post-operative visits, groups displayed similar rates of functional elbow ROM. At latest follow-up rates of patient-reported pain, ultimate elbow ROM, time to radiographic healing were equivalent. No significant differences were observed in ulna non-union, joint malalignment, post-operative nerve injury, post-operative infection, heterotopic ossification, incidence of hardware failure, patient-reported pain, and rate of removal of symptomatic hardware. Sub-analysis of radial head replacement versus fixation revealed equivalent percentage of patients with full ROM at each post-operative time point.

CONCLUSION

For Bado II Monteggia fracture-dislocations, the surgical approach to the radial head-TOP versus Kocher-does not influence ultimate patient outcomes or complication rates. Radial head replacement and fixation provide comparable results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.