Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2019
Vojta Therapy versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for lumbosciatica syndrome: A quasi-experimental pilot study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Juárez-Albuixech María Lidia, Redondo-González Olga, Tello Inmaculada, Collado-Vázquez Susana, Jiménez-Antona Carmen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lumbosciatica is a common condition that affects patients' quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of Vojta Therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of lumbosciatica.
METHODS: A "pre-post" quasi-experimental pilot study was carried out on 12 patients between 31 and 74 years of age who had been diagnosed with lumbosciatica and referred to the Physiotherapy Unit of the Quintanar de la Orden Health Center. Subjects were prescribed either TENS or Vojta, assigned alternately (6:6). All patients received one session of 30 min per day for 15 days. Tests to evaluate pain, disability, functionality, and radiculopathy were performed.
RESULTS: The differences between pre-post measures and improvement after both treatments were analyzed with nonparametric tests. Significant improvements were noted after both treatments in indices for pain, disability, and flexibility, with the exception of disability after TENS, according to the Roland-Morris test (p = 0.066). Improvements in radiculopathy (Làsegue sign) were only observed with Vojta (p = 0.031). An overall decrease in scores obtained after Vojta was observed with respect to those obtained after TENS (difference V-T): pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (V-T = 2.84; p = 0.033) or Oswestry back pain (V-T = 2.67; p = 0.030) and leg pain tests (V-T = 3.25; p = 0.063); disability according to Oswestry (V-T = 28.33; p = 0.005) and Roland-Morris (V-T = 5.67; p = 0.044); flexibility according to Schöber (average gain V-T = 0.43; p = 0.292) and the fingertips to floor distance test (V-T = 7.5; p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Vojta Therapy led to significantly greater improvements in pain, disability, flexibility, and radiculopathy than TENS. Future studies will require larger samples to confirm these findings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of Vojta Therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of lumbosciatica.
METHODS: A "pre-post" quasi-experimental pilot study was carried out on 12 patients between 31 and 74 years of age who had been diagnosed with lumbosciatica and referred to the Physiotherapy Unit of the Quintanar de la Orden Health Center. Subjects were prescribed either TENS or Vojta, assigned alternately (6:6). All patients received one session of 30 min per day for 15 days. Tests to evaluate pain, disability, functionality, and radiculopathy were performed.
RESULTS: The differences between pre-post measures and improvement after both treatments were analyzed with nonparametric tests. Significant improvements were noted after both treatments in indices for pain, disability, and flexibility, with the exception of disability after TENS, according to the Roland-Morris test (p = 0.066). Improvements in radiculopathy (Làsegue sign) were only observed with Vojta (p = 0.031). An overall decrease in scores obtained after Vojta was observed with respect to those obtained after TENS (difference V-T): pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (V-T = 2.84; p = 0.033) or Oswestry back pain (V-T = 2.67; p = 0.030) and leg pain tests (V-T = 3.25; p = 0.063); disability according to Oswestry (V-T = 28.33; p = 0.005) and Roland-Morris (V-T = 5.67; p = 0.044); flexibility according to Schöber (average gain V-T = 0.43; p = 0.292) and the fingertips to floor distance test (V-T = 7.5; p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Vojta Therapy led to significantly greater improvements in pain, disability, flexibility, and radiculopathy than TENS. Future studies will require larger samples to confirm these findings.