Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
Ultrasound-Guided Synovial Biopsy Can Be Effectively and Safely Performed in Different Clinical Settings Favouring a Widespread Application of Precision Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Post-hoc Analysis of Three Clinical Trials.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Congia Mattia, Marini Stefano, Nerviani Alessandra, Rivellese Felice, Thorborn Georgina, Hands Rebecca, Angioni Maria Maddalena, Chessa Elisabetta, Floris Alberto, Mascia Piero, Piga Matteo, Humby Frances, Marcia Stefano, Pitzalis Costantino, Cauli Alberto
Аннотация
Objectives: In the perspective of an increasingly widespread application of precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy (US-SB) performed in an experienced rheumatology and community hospital setting. Methods: A post hoc analysis of R4RA, STRAP and STRAP-EU trials was performed, comparing US-SB performed in a radiology department of a community hospital without experience in RA (n = 14), versus a rheumatology academic centre with a high expertise in RA management and US-SB (n = 16). Suitability of specimens for histological and transcriptomic analysis (tissue and RNA quality) was analyzed as the main outcome. Results: Demographic and clinical features of the two patients' groups were similar, except of disease duration (p < 0.05). No differences were recorded regarding site and ultrasound of the biopsied joint. Suitability for histological (% of gradable tissue) and transcriptomic analysis (RIN >3) was similar in the two cohorts (both 85.7% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.88). Proportion of gradable biopsies in total (59.2% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.96) and for each patient (52% vs. 56.15%, p = 0.77), were similar in both cohorts. Adverse events were rare (two in community hospital cohort, one in rheumatology cohort, p = 0.54), none considered severe. Seven patients in the community hospital experienced mild or severe pain, only two referred the same in the rheumatology cohort (p = 0.04). Conclusions: US-SB can be safely and effectively performed in a community hospital without experience in RA. A larger diffusion of this technique could allow to pursuit a tailored approach also in ordinary rheumatology outpatient clinics.