Prenatal Closure of Myeloschisis vs Myelomeningocele: Insights From the fMMC Consortium Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myelomeningocele is defined by the presence of a fluid-filled sac that contains the neural placode and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the level of the spinal defect. Alternatively, the term myeloschisis is used when the neural placode is not contained within a CSF-filled sac. While both are eligible for prenatal closure, few studies have characterized the impact of the type of lesion on postnatal outcomes. This study compares the outcomes of these 2 types of open spinal dysraphism using data from the Fetal Myelomeningocele Consortium registry sponsored by the North American Fetal Therapy Network.

METHODS: The prospective observational Fetal Myelomeningocele Consortium registry was used to extract deidentified data corresponding to patients who underwent fetal closure of myelomeningocele vs myeloschisis. Demographics, operative characteristics, perioperative complications, and postnatal outcomes were collected.

RESULTS: A total of 1327 patients were identified, including 991 (74.7%) with myelomeningocele and 336 (25.3%) with myeloschisis. Compared with myelomeningocele, myeloschisis was associated with lower rates of prenatal talipes (11% vs 24%, P < .001) and higher rates of favorable prenatal movement (94% vs 86%, P < .001). Postnatally, myeloschisis conferred higher rates of leg movement (97% vs 90%, P = .002) and an increased likelihood of ambulation in the household (10.4% vs 4.1%, P = .009) and outside (7.2% vs 1.9%, P = .004) at 1 year. However, myeloschisis was also linked to greater use of skin patches during closure (49% vs 27%, P < .001), higher CSF leak rates among those with wound dehiscence (26% vs 8%, P = .014), and more frequent CSF diversion and tethered cord surgeries at follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Myeloschisis and myelomeningocele demonstrate distinct clinical profiles. Although patients with myeloschisis may have favorable motor outcomes, they are also characterized by higher rates of CSF leakage, CSF diversion, and tethered cord surgery. These findings highlight the need for lesion-specific prognostication and may inform surgical planning and parental counseling in the context of prenatal spina bifida closure.