MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/03635465251383162

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of sports medicine · 2025

Does the Timing of Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Affect Final Range of Motion?

Schneble Christopher A, Miltenberg Benjamin, Jurgensmeier Kevin, Davis Gaston, Tagliero Adam J, Freedman Kevin B, Krych Aaron J, Cohen Steven B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is seen in 1.7% to 38% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and has been associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There are limited data regarding the optimal time to intervene in cases of arthrofibrosis after ACLR.

PURPOSE: To assess if timing of arthrofibrosis treatment after ACLR affects final knee range of motion (ROM) and to help establish guidelines with regard to timing of intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACLR.

STUDY

DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Databases were retrospectively screened at 2 high-volume practices for patients who underwent lysis of adhesions (LOA; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29884 and 29875) with or without manipulation under anesthesia (CPT 27570) after ACLR (CPT 29888). Clinical ROM assessments were collected at multiple time points. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on timing of LOA. Comparative analysis was performed to assess for relationships between ROM and timing of intervention.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients underwent LOA after ACLR: 25 patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, 23 patients between 3 and 6 months, and 31 patients >6 months. Earlier LOA was associated with greater total loss of motion before LOA. The final total arc of motion was 132.7°, 133.7°, and 131.8° for patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, between 3 and 6 months, and >6 months, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups in final flexion (P = .8), extension (P = .746), or total arc of motion (P = .781). Linear regression modeling did not identify time from ACLR to LOA as a predictive variable (P = .982) in final ROM.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate a linear relationship between the timing of LOA and final ROM. Regardless of the time to intervention, ROM improved significantly; however, patients with more severe arthrofibrosis underwent LOA at earlier time points.

Для цитирования: Schneble Christopher A, Miltenberg Benjamin, Jurgensmeier Kevin, Davis Gaston, Tagliero Adam J, Freedman Kevin B, Krych Aaron J, Cohen Steven B. Does the Timing of Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Affect Final Range of Motion?. The American journal of sports medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251383162.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.