MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sc.2014.220

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2015

Transcranial magnetic stimulation but not MRI predicts long-term clinical status in cervical spondylosis: a case series.

Deftereos S N, Kechagias E, Ioakeimidou C, Georgonikou D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Case series.

OBJECTIVE

To compare transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between patients who underwent surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and those with spondylosis who were not operated upon, and to correlate these findings with clinical functionality at follow-up.

SETTING

Private practice.

METHODS

Of 16 consecutive patients with cervical spondylosis 8 underwent surgery (group I) and 8 were treated conservatively (group II). We compared TMS and MRI findings between these groups and we correlated central motor conduction times (CMCTs) and MRI-measured sagittal and parasagittal diameters of the spinal canal at baseline evaluation, with clinical functionality at 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Group I CMCTs at the lower limbs correlated significantly with modified-JoA 2 years post surgery (r=-0.71, P<0.05), but MRI-measured diameters did not. In group II baseline TMS was unrevealing, contrary to significant spinal stenosis disclosed by MRI. The condition of none of these patients deteriorated at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CMCTs at the lower limbs, but not cervical spinal canal diameters, correlate with long-term functional outcome following surgical or conservative treatment.

Для цитирования: Deftereos S N, Kechagias E, Ioakeimidou C, Georgonikou D. Transcranial magnetic stimulation but not MRI predicts long-term clinical status in cervical spondylosis: a case series.. Spinal cord. 2015. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.220.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.