Hospital practice (1995) · 2017
Intra-articular corticosteroid injections in haemophilic arthropathy: are they recommended?
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodriguez-Merchan E Carlos
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid (CS) injections are commonly used in the treatment of osteoarthritis. However, they are rarely utilized in haemophilic arthropathy. In fact, the efficacy of this method in haemophilic arthropathy is frequently discussed and debated in clinical practice.
AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of IA CS injections in patients with painful haemophilic arthropathy.
METHODS: A review of the literature on the topic was performed.
RESULTS: In osteoarthritis, reports with a high level of evidence state that the efficacy of IA injections of CS is controversial. In haemophilic arthropathy, some low-level evidence reports seem to indicate that short-term pain alleviation can be achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering that pain relief after IA injections of CS is controversial and that the cost of the haematologic treatment required to perform the procedure is high in haemophilic arthropathy, we do not recommend the routine use of CS IS injections in haemophilia. Moreover, point of care (POC) ultrasound (US)-guided injections are not advised, because the injection procedure is so simple that the use of POC-US will unnecessarily prolong the duration of the procedure.
AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of IA CS injections in patients with painful haemophilic arthropathy.
METHODS: A review of the literature on the topic was performed.
RESULTS: In osteoarthritis, reports with a high level of evidence state that the efficacy of IA injections of CS is controversial. In haemophilic arthropathy, some low-level evidence reports seem to indicate that short-term pain alleviation can be achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering that pain relief after IA injections of CS is controversial and that the cost of the haematologic treatment required to perform the procedure is high in haemophilic arthropathy, we do not recommend the routine use of CS IS injections in haemophilia. Moreover, point of care (POC) ultrasound (US)-guided injections are not advised, because the injection procedure is so simple that the use of POC-US will unnecessarily prolong the duration of the procedure.