Extensor tendon transfer for fracture-related extensor pollicis longus rupture: Long-term outcome case series.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Spontaneous rupture of the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon following both nonoperative and operative treatment of distal radius fractures has been well described.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of extensor indicis proprius to EPL tendon transfers for patients following distal radius fracture and EPL tendon repair.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective case series focusing on long-term clinical outcomes.
METHODS
A retrospective review was conducted for patients who sustained a distal radius fracture and subsequently underwent extensor tendon transfer from 2005-2015 at a private practice center. Outcome measures including index finger (IF) metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and thumb interphalangeal (IP) active range of motion (ROM), digital extension against resistance, subjective complaints, and QuickDASH scores were recorded at final follow-up.
RESULTS
Seven patients were included in the study. There were six females and one male subject, mean age of 54 ± 13 years at injury of EPL, and 5/7 involved the left upper extremity. For isolated function, 7/7 (100%) patients had isolated, active IF MCP extension, 6/7 (86%) could extend IF MCP and thumb IP against resistance. Mean IF MCP extension was 1° ± 2°, mean IF MCP flexion was 89° ± 2°, mean thumb IP extension was -5° ± 4°, and mean thumb IP flexion was 67° ± 15°. Mean QuickDASH score was 16 ± 14.
CONCLUSIONS
This series shows good long-term functional and patient reported outcomes in patients following extensor indicis proprius to EPL tendon transfers at a single center.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.