MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00132-013-2181-2

Медицинская библиотека · Der Orthopade · 2013

[Brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a retrospective study and analysis according to the SRS criteria].

Heidt C, Kong E, Torode I, Balakumar J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with bracing at The Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne Australia according to the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria and evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment method.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

During the 1 year survey 125 patients with AIS were treated with bracing and 52 (42 %) of those fulfilled the SRS criteria. Measurements were performed according to the follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 13.1 years and the mean Cobb angle at the start of therapy was 31.8°. Thirtynine (76 %) patients were treated successfully and an improvement of the Cobb angle was achieved in 26 (51 %) patients. A further 6 patients (12 %) required surgery and 7 (14 %) showed a Cobb angle of more than 45° after reaching skeletal maturity.

CONCLUSION

The results show the effectiveness of bracing as a treatment method for patients with AIS. The SRS criteria provide good guidance to classify patients who are likely to benefit from this treatment. A better comparison of the outcome with other studies can be achieved by using these criteria.

Для цитирования: Heidt C, Kong E, Torode I, Balakumar J. [Brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a retrospective study and analysis according to the SRS criteria].. Der Orthopade. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-013-2181-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.