MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21037/jss-22-115

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2023

Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.

Tomé-Bermejo Félix, Moreno-Mateo Fernando, Piñera-Parrilla Ángel, Cervera-Irimia Javier, Mengis-Palleck Charles Louis, Gallego-Bustos Jesús, Garzón-Márquez Francisco, Rodríguez-Arguisjuela María G, Sanz-Aguilera Sylvia, de la Rosa-Zabala Kelman Luis, Avilés-Morente Carmen, Oliveros-Escudero Beatriz, Núñez-Torrealba Alexa Anaís, Alvarez-Galovich Luis

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompression to avoid the need for instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome between older and younger patients undergoing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes. One hundred and fifty-four patients underwent 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 87 patients ≤65 years of age who underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion; Group 2: 67 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent the same procedures with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pedicle-screw augmentation. Mean follow-up 27.47 months (range, 76-24 months).

RESULTS

Mean age was 49.1 years old (range, 24-65) for the younger group and 77.8 (range, 75-86) in the elderly group. Patients ≥75 years of age showed higher preoperative comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiology, ASA: 1.7 vs. 2.4), and ≥2 systemic diseases with greater frequency (12.5% vs. 44.7%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, fusion, or revision rate. During follow-up, adjacent disc disease and adjacent fracture occurred significantly more in Group 2 (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the clinical and health-related quality of life scores or satisfaction with treatment received.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis represents a major consideration before performing spine surgery. Despite an obvious increased risk of complications in elderly patients, PMMA-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw instrumentation in spine fusion represents a safe and effective surgical treatment option to elderly patients with poor bone quality. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication in otherwise appropriately selected patients.

Для цитирования: Tomé-Bermejo Félix, Moreno-Mateo Fernando, Piñera-Parrilla Ángel, Cervera-Irimia Javier, Mengis-Palleck Charles Louis, Gallego-Bustos Jesús, Garzón-Márquez Francisco, Rodríguez-Arguisjuela María G, Sanz-Aguilera Sylvia, de la Rosa-Zabala Kelman Luis, Avilés-Morente Carmen, Oliveros-Escudero Beatriz, Núñez-Torrealba Alexa Anaís, Alvarez-Galovich Luis. Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.. Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong). 2023. DOI: 10.21037/jss-22-115.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.