Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
Neither lateral patellar facet nor patellar size are altered in patellofemoral unstable patients: a comparative magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Otto Alexander, Tscholl Philippe M, Pääsuke Reedik, Herbst Elmar, Willinger Lukas, Imhoff Andreas B, Brucker P U
Аннотация
PURPOSE: It remains unclear if morphologic patterns of the patella itself predispose to patellar instability. This study examined established patellar landmarks in relation to the femoral condyle width to clarify differences of patellar morphologies in patellofemoral stable and unstable patients.
METHODS: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of 50 subjects (20.7 ± 4.4 years; 17 males, 33 females) with patellofemoral instability (study group, SG) and 50 subjects (25.3 ± 5.8 years; 31 males, 19 females) with anterior cruciate ligament rupture (control group, CG) were analyzed. Corresponding patellar value indices (PW-I; LPF-I 1; LPF-I 2) in relation to the femoral condyle width (FCW) were evaluated after the measurement of absolute patellar dimension [patellar width (PW); direct length of the lateral patellar facet (LPF-1); projected length of the lateral patellar facet (LPF-2)]. The patellar shape according to Wiberg, trochlear dysplasia, patellar height, and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were determined.
RESULTS: The SG showed a significantly longer absolute (LPF 2) (P = 0.041) and relative (LPF-I 1, LPF-I 2) (P < 0.001) lateral facet of the patella. No significant differences were evaluable for the relative patellar width (PW-I) (ns). A patellar shape type 3 (P = 0.001) as well as a higher position of the patella and TT-TG-distance (P < 0.001) were significantly more often present in the SG.
CONCLUSION: There are several bony alterations associated with patellofemoral instability, but our data did not show a significantly smaller lateral patellar facet or relative patellar width that could facilitate a patellar dislocation. This helps surgeons, that are considering to surgically address the patella in cases of patellofemoral instability, to better understand its morphologic pattern.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
METHODS: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of 50 subjects (20.7 ± 4.4 years; 17 males, 33 females) with patellofemoral instability (study group, SG) and 50 subjects (25.3 ± 5.8 years; 31 males, 19 females) with anterior cruciate ligament rupture (control group, CG) were analyzed. Corresponding patellar value indices (PW-I; LPF-I 1; LPF-I 2) in relation to the femoral condyle width (FCW) were evaluated after the measurement of absolute patellar dimension [patellar width (PW); direct length of the lateral patellar facet (LPF-1); projected length of the lateral patellar facet (LPF-2)]. The patellar shape according to Wiberg, trochlear dysplasia, patellar height, and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were determined.
RESULTS: The SG showed a significantly longer absolute (LPF 2) (P = 0.041) and relative (LPF-I 1, LPF-I 2) (P < 0.001) lateral facet of the patella. No significant differences were evaluable for the relative patellar width (PW-I) (ns). A patellar shape type 3 (P = 0.001) as well as a higher position of the patella and TT-TG-distance (P < 0.001) were significantly more often present in the SG.
CONCLUSION: There are several bony alterations associated with patellofemoral instability, but our data did not show a significantly smaller lateral patellar facet or relative patellar width that could facilitate a patellar dislocation. This helps surgeons, that are considering to surgically address the patella in cases of patellofemoral instability, to better understand its morphologic pattern.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.